Cited by 10Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation

Open access
Anderson, Colin J., Yang, HsihTe, Parsons, Judy, Ahrens, Will A., Jagosky, Megan H., Hsu, Johann H., Patt, Joshua C., Kneisl, Jeffrey S. +1 more·2025·Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A liquid biopsy is a test that evaluates the status of a disease by analyzing a sample of bodily fluid, most commonly blood. In recent years, there has been progress in the development and clinical application of liquid biopsy methods to identify blood-based, tumor-specific biomarkers for many cancer types. However, the implementation of these technologies to aid in the treatment of patients who have a sarcoma remains behind other fields of cancer medicine. For this study, we chose to evaluate a sarcoma liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). All human beings have normal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in the blood. In contrast with cfDNA, ctDNA is genetic material present in the blood stream that is derived from a tumor. ctDNA carries the unique genomic fingerprint of the tumor with changes that are not present in normal circulating cfDNA. A successful ctDNA liquid biopsy must be able to target these tumor-specific genetic alterations. For instance, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are common in lung cancers, and ctDNA liquid biopsies are currently in clinical use to evaluate the status of disease in patients who have a lung cancer by detecting EGFR mutations in the blood. As opposed to many carcinomas, sarcomas do not have common recurrent mutations that could serve as the foundation to a ctDNA liquid biopsy. However, many sarcomas have structural changes to their chromosomes, including gains and losses of portions or entire chromosomes, known as copy number alterations (CNAs), that could serve as a target for a ctDNA liquid biopsy. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) amplification in select lipomatous tumors or parosteal osteosarcoma is an example of a CNA due to the presence of extra copies of a segment of the long arm of chromosome 12. Since a majority of sarcomas demonstrate a complex karyotype with numerous CNAs, a blood-based liquid biopsy strategy that searches for these CNAs may be able to detect the presence of sarcoma ctDNA. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a next-generation sequencing technique that evaluates the entire genome. The depth of coverage of WGS refers to how detailed the sequencing is, like higher versus lower power on a microscope. WGS can be performed with high-depth sequencing (that is, > 60×), which can detect individual point mutations, or low-depth sequencing (that is, 0.1× to 5×), referred to as low-passage whole-genome sequencing (LP-WGS), which may not detect individual mutations but can detect structural chromosomal changes including gains and losses (that is, CNAs). While similar strategies have shown favorable early results for specific sarcoma subtypes, LP-WGS has not been evaluated for applicability to the broader population of patients who have a sarcoma. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does an LP-WGS liquid biopsy evaluating for CNAs detect ctDNA in plasma samples from patients who have sarcomas representing a variety of histologic subtypes? METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a community-based, tertiary referral center. Nine paired (plasma and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] tissue) and four unpaired (plasma) specimens from patients who had a sarcoma were obtained from a commercial biospecimen bank. Three control specimens from individuals who did not have cancer were also obtained. The paired and unpaired specimens from patients who had a sarcoma represented a variety of sarcoma histologic subtypes. cfDNA was extracted, amplified, and quantified. Libraries were prepared, and LP-WGS was performed using a NextSeq 500 next-generation sequencing machine at a low depth of sequencing coverage (∼1×). The ichorCNA bioinformatics algorithm, which was designed to detect CNAs from low-depth genomic sequencing data, was used to analyze the data. In contrast with the gold standard for diagnosis in the form of histopathologic analysis of a tissue sample, this test does not discriminate between sarcoma subtypes but detects the presence of tumor-derived CNAs within the ctDNA in the blood that should not be present in a patient who does not have cancer. The liquid biopsy was positive for the detection of cancer if the ichorCNA algorithm detected the presence of ctDNA. The algorithm was also used to quantitatively estimate the percent ctDNA within the cfDNA. The concentration of ctDNA was then calculated from the percent ctDNA relative to the total concentration of cfDNA. The CNAs of the paired FFPE tissue and plasma samples were graphically visualized using aCNViewer software. RESULTS: This LP-WGS liquid biopsy detected ctDNA in 9 of 13 of the plasma specimens from patients with a sarcoma. The other four samples from patients with a sarcoma and all serum specimens from patients without cancer had no detectable ctDNA. Of those 9 patients with positive liquid biopsy results, the percent ctDNA ranged from 6% to 11%, and calculated ctDNA quantities were 0.04 to 5.6 ng/mL, which are levels to be expected when ctDNA is detectable. CONCL

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/corr.0000000000003161

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low-pass or ultra-low-pass WGS has the advantage of genome-wide CNA detection without requiring predefined mutation panels, making it conceptually attractive for complex-karyotype sarcomas.

    “Its main advantage is genome-wide CNA detection without requiring predefined mutation panels, making it conceptually attractive for complex-karyotype sarcomas [ 33 ].”
  • Broad plasma panels, CNA-based WGS, methylation-based assays, cfRNA approaches, and CTC-based strategies remain more exploratory or proof-of-concept in most sarcoma subtypes, particularly when applied to low-volume MRD or routine surveillance settings.

    “In contrast, broad plasma panels, CNA-based WGS, methylation-based assays, cfRNA approaches, and CTC-based strategies remain more exploratory or proof-of-concept in most sarcoma subtypes, particularly when applied to low-volume MRD or routine surveillance settings [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].”
  • Commercial or large-panel plasma profiling may identify clinically relevant alterations in selected advanced cases.

    “Commercial or large-panel plasma profiling may identify clinically relevant alterations in selected advanced cases, but variable tissue–plasma concordance, low tumor fraction, and inconsistent copy-number detection limit its use as a general surveillance strategy [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer; 2010.
  2. Jain S, Xu R, Prieto VG, Lee P. Molecular classification of soft tissue sarcomas and its clinical applications. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2010;3:416-428.
  3. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. 5 th ed. IARC Press; 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, C. J., Yang, H., Parsons, J., Ahrens, W. A., Jagosky, M. H., Hsu, J. H., Patt, J. C., Kneisl, J. S., & Steuerwald, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
  • Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte, NC, USA
Venue
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
Published
2024-06-21
Volume
483
Issue
1
Pages
39-48
ISSN
  • 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1132
OpenAlex
W4399880655
Cited by
10
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
liquid biopsy, circulating tumor DNA, sarcoma, copy number alterations, tumor genomic alterations, MDM2 amplification, parosteal osteosarcoma, lipomatous tumor, tumor-specific biomarkers, tumor heterogeneity, treatment response monitoring
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Liquid Biopsy, Circulating Tumor DNA, Adult, Aged, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Pilot Projects, Predictive Value of Tests, Sarcoma, Biomarkers, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review