Cited by 70Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Standardized Screening Facilitates Timely Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Diverse Sample of Low-Risk Toddlers

Open access
Herlihy, Lauren E., Brooks, Bianca, Dumont-Mathieu, Thyde, Barton, Marianne L., Fein, Deborah, Chen, Chi-Ming, Robins, Diana L.·2014·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Routine, standardized screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been hypothesized to reduce known racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in age of first diagnosis. This study explored demographic differences in toddlers' age and performance on developmental measures at the time of ASD assessment. METHOD: Toddlers (16-39 months at evaluation) who screened at-risk for developmental delay on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) or M-CHAT-Revised (M-CHAT-R) and follow-up interview participated in a diagnostic assessment. Of these, 44.7% were racial/ethnic minorities and 53.5% were non-minorities. Child race/ethnicity, years of maternal education (MEd), and household yearly income (YI) were parent-reported. RESULTS: Small but significant correlations were observed between MEd or YI and evaluation age and adaptive communication, socialization, and motor scores. Controlling for MEd and YI, minority racial/ethnic group did not predict child's performance on most measures and did not predict likelihood of ASD diagnosis. Differences in age at evaluation and receptive language skills were small effects. CONCLUSION: Significant but small effects emerged for SES and minority status on toddlers' age at evaluation and parent-reported adaptive skills, but these did not predict ASD diagnosis. The small magnitude of these effects suggests that routine, standardized screening for ASD in toddlers and timely access to diagnostic evaluation can reduce disparities in age at diagnosis and possibly reduce racial/ethnic disparities in access to services for ASD and other developmental delays.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000014

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [25]Mullen E Mullen Scales of Early Learning 1995 American Guidance Service, Inc Circle Pines, MN AGS Edition
  2. [27]Sparrow SS Cicchetti DV Balla DA Vineland II: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, survey forms manual 2005 AGS Publishing Circle Pines, MN
  3. [30]Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates New Jersey second edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herlihy, L. E., Brooks, B., Dumont-Mathieu, T., Barton, M. L., Fein, D., Chen, C.-M., & Robins, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Herlihy, Lauren E.
  • Dumont-Mathieu, Thyde
  • Barton, Marianne L.
  • Fein, Deborah
  • Chen, Chi-Ming
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2014-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
85-92
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969070314
Cited by
70
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Connecticut
  • Georgia State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R40 MC00270)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH12550, F31MH012550)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039961, HD39961)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism screening, toddlers, age at diagnosis, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic status, developmental delay, M-CHAT, adaptive communication, socialization, motor skills, receptive language, access to diagnostic services
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Income, Infant, Male, Mass Screening, Minority Groups, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk, Social Class, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review