Cited by 126Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Guanfacine in children with autism and/or intellectual disabilities

Handen, Benjamin L., Sahl, Robert, Hardan, Antonio Y.·2008·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 3%-5% of typical school-age children. However, considerably higher rates of ADHD (15%-25%) are observed in children with intellectual disability and autism. Studies of psychostimulants in the latter two populations have found poorer response rates compared to typically developing children. In addition, evidence suggests that children with developmental disabilities experience higher rates of adverse events. Guanfacine, an alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist, has shown some promise as an alternative to psychostimulants. METHODS: The present study involved a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of guanfacine in 11 children (ages 5-9 years) with developmental disabilities and symptoms of inattention/overactivity. The 6-week trial involved a maximum dose of 3 mg/day of guanfacine. RESULTS: Significant benefits were observed on the Hyperactivity subscale of the parent and teacher Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and Global Improvement Ratings. No gains were noted on other ABC subscales. Five of the 11 subjects (45%) were judged to be responders based on a 50% decrease in the ABC Hyperactivity subscale score between the placebo and guanfacine conditions. Several side effects were reported, including drowsiness and irritability. CONCLUSION: While guanfacine appears to be an alternative to psychostimulants among children with developmental disabilities, clinicians need to remain vigilant to the possibility of side effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0b013e3181739b9d

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Handen, B. L., Sahl, R., & Hardan, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Handen, Benjamin L.
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2008-08
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
303-308
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076254448
Cited by
126
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
guanfacine, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, developmental disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, inattention, hyperactivity, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, adverse effects, sleepiness, irritability
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autistic Disorder, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Guanfacine, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review