Cited by 161Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Alpha-2 agonists for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy and add-on trials to stimulant therapy

Hirota, Tomoya, Schwartz, Shimon, Correll, Christoph U.·2014·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of α-2 agonists in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Method We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until May 2013 for randomized trials comparing α-2 agonists with placebo in ADHD youth. Primary outcome was reduction in overall ADHD symptoms. Secondary outcomes included hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattentiveness, oppositional defiant disorder symptoms (ODD symptoms), all-cause discontinuation, specific-cause discontinuation, and adverse effects. Standardized mean differences (SMD), relative risk (RR), and number-needed-to-treat/number-needed-to-harm (NNT/NNH) were calculated. Data were analyzed separately in monotherapy and as add-on to psychostimulants.Results Altogether, 12 studies (N = 2,276) were included. Across 9 studies (n = 1,550), α-2 agonist monotherapy significantly reduced overall ADHD symptoms (SMD = -0.59, p < .00001), hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = -0.56, p < .00001), inattention (SMD = -0.57, p < .00001), and ODD symptoms (SMD = -0.44, p = .0004). Similarly, α-2 agonist add-on treatment (3 studies, n = 726) significantly reduced overall ADHD symptoms (SMD = -0.36, p < .0001), hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = -0.33, p < .0001), and inattention (SMD = -0.34, p < .0001), but effect sizes were lower than in monotherapy trials (p = .03-0.04). As monotherapy, α-2 agonists had lower all-cause (RR = 0.70, p = .01, NNT = 10) and inefficacy-related (RR = 0.39, p < .0001) discontinuations than did placebo; however, intolerability-related discontinuation was similar, despite significantly more common fatigue (NNH = 10), sedation (NNH = 17), and somnolence (NNH = 4) and significantly greater hypotensive (clonidine-IR), bradycardic (clonidine-IR), and QTc prolonging (guanfacine-XR) effects. Added to stimulants, α-2 agonists had all-cause and specific-cause discontinuations that were comparable to those of placebo, but somnolence (NNH = 10) was more common, and hypotensive and bradycardic effects (clonidine-XR and guanfacine-XR) were greater than with placebo.Conclusions α-2 Agonist monotherapy and, possibly to a lesser extent, co-treatment, are significantly superior to placebo for overall, hyperactivity, and inattentive ADHD symptoms. Efficacy advantages need to be balanced against fatigue, somnolence/sedation, hypotension, bradycardia, and possibly QTc prolongation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.11.009

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only extended-release guanfacine and extended-release clonidine have evidence supporting their use as adjunctive therapy with stimulant medications sufficient to have achieved FDA approval.

    “Only extended-release guanfacine and extended-release clonidine have evidence supporting their use as adjunctive therapy with stimulant medications sufficient to have achieved FDA approval.127”
  • Data from randomized trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses show that atomoxetine and alpha-2-adrenergic agonists are more effective than placebo in reducing the core symptoms of ADHD, but as a class, they are less effective than stimulants.

    “Data from randomized trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses show that atomoxetine and alpha-2-adrenergic agonists are more effective than placebo in reducing the core symptoms of ADHD, but as a class, they are less effective than stimulants [49, 55, 56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirota, T., Schwartz, S., & Correll, C. U.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Correll, Christoph U.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
153-173
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050973084
Cited by
161
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 11
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children with ADHD, monotherapy, adjunctive therapy, stimulant medication, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention, oppositional defiant disorder, treatment discontinuation, adverse effects, fatigue, sedation, treatment efficacy and safety, number needed to treat, number needed to harm, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review