Cited by 93Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesBayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy and History of Science

Identification of Natural Direct Effects When a Confounder of the Mediator Is Directly Affected by Exposure

Open access
Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J., VanderWeele, Tyler J.·2014·Epidemiology

Abstract

Natural direct and indirect effects formalize traditional notions of mediation analysis into a rigorous causal framework and have recently received considerable attention in epidemiology and in social sciences. Sufficient conditions for the identification of natural direct effects were formulated by Judea Pearl under a nonparametric structural equations model, which assumes certain independencies between potential outcomes. A common situation in epidemiology is that a confounder of the mediator-outcome relationship is itself affected by the exposure, in which case natural direct effects fail to be nonparametrically identified without additional assumptions, even under Pearl's nonparametric structural equations model. In this article, we show that when a single binary confounder of the mediator is affected by the exposure, the natural direct effect is nonparametrically identified under the model, assuming monotonicity about the effect of the exposure on the confounder. A similar result is shown to hold for a vector of binary confounders of the mediator under a certain independence assumption about the confounders. Finally, we show that natural direct effects are more generally identified if there is no additive mean interaction between the mediator and the confounders of the mediator affected by exposure. When correct, this latter assumption is particularly appealing because it does not require monotonicity of effects of the exposure. In addition, it places no restriction on the nature of the confounders of the mediator, which can be continuous or polytomous.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000000054

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Pearl J Direct and indirect effects 411 42 Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-01) San Francisco, CA 2001 Morgan Kaufmann
  2. [19]Robins JM Berkane M Causal Inference from Complex Longitudinal Data. Latent Variable Modeling and Applications to Causality. Lecture Notes in Statistics (120) 1997 69 117 Springer Verlag NY
  3. [20]Robins JM Richardson TS Shrout P Alternative graphical causal models and the identification of direct effects. To appear in Causality and Psychopathology: Finding the Determinants of Disorders and Their Cures 2010 Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., & VanderWeele, T. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2014-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
282-291
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061754265
Cited by
93
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Collection of Biostatistics Research Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA134294, R35CA197449)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI104459)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES020337)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
natural direct effect, mediation analysis, nonparametric identification, monotonicity assumption
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Models, Statistical, Epidemiologic Research Design, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review