The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review Article: Vulnerability to Heat-related Mortality
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Addressing vulnerability to heat-related mortality is a necessary step in the development of policies dictated by heat action plans. We aimed to provide a systematic assessment of the epidemiologic evidence regarding vulnerability to heat-related mortality. METHODS: Studies assessing the association between high ambient temperature or heat waves and mortality among different subgroups and published between January 1980 and August 2014 were selected. Estimates of association for all the included subgroups were extracted. We assessed the presence of heterogeneous effects between subgroups conducting Cochran Q tests. We conducted random effect meta-analyses of ratios of relative risks (RRR) for high ambient temperature studies. We performed random effects meta-regression analyses to investigate factors associated with the magnitude of the RRR. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included. Using the Cochran Q test, we consistently found evidence of vulnerability for the elderly ages >85 years. We found a pooled RRR of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97, 1.01) for male sex, 1.02 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.03) for age >65 years, 1.04 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.07) for ages >75 years, 1.03 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.05) for low individual socioeconomic status (SES), and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.99, 1.02) for low ecologic SES. CONCLUSIONS: We found strongest evidence of heat-related vulnerability for the elderly ages >65 and >75 years and low SES groups (at the individual level). Studies are needed to clarify if other subgroups (e.g., children, people living alone) are also vulnerable to heat to inform public health programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Wang, L., Tong, S., Toloo, G. S., & Yu, W. (2014) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2013.11.001 · Cited by 3
RetractedPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Brook, R. D., Rajagopalan, S., Pope, C. A., Brook, J. R., Bhatnagar, A., Diez-Roux, A. V., Holguin, F., Hong, Y., Luepker, R. V., Mittleman, M. A., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3181dbece1 · Cited by 6,548
Self-citationInteraction revisited: the difference between two estimates.
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219 · Cited by 3,203
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough
Garg, A. X., Hackam, D., & Tonelli, M. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.01430307 · Cited by 2,258
Socioeconomic Status in Health Research: One Size Does Not Fit All
Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., & Posner, S. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.22.2879 · Cited by 2,242
Life course epidemiology: Figure 1
Kuh, D., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Lynch, J., Hallqvist, J., & Power, C. (2003) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.57.10.778 · Cited by 2,019
Cited by
The burden of heat-related mortality attributable to recent human-induced climate change
Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M., Scovronick, N., Sera, F., Royé, D., Schneider, R., Tobias, A., Astrom, C., Guo, Y., Honda, Y., Hondula, D. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x · Cited by 1,347
Heatwave and health impact research: A global review
Campbell, S., Remenyi, T. A., White, C. J., & Johnston, F. H. (2018) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.017 · Cited by 573
Kabisch, N., van den Bosch, M., & Lafortezza, R. (2017) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.004 · Cited by 482
Sarofim, M. C., Saha, S., Hawkins, M. D., Mills, D. M., Hess, J., Horton, R., Kinney, P., Schwartz, J., & St. Juliana, A. (2016) · doi:10.7930/j0mg7mdx · Cited by 88
Xu, R., Zhao, Q., Coelho, M. S. Z. S., Saldiva, P. H. N., Abramson, M. J., Li, S., & Guo, Y. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003369 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Benmarhnia, T., Deguen, S., Kaufman, J. S., & Smargiassi, A.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 781-793
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2258354078
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review Article: Vulnerability to Heat-related Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ede.0000000000000375
- The paper
- Benmarhnia, T., Deguen, S., Kaufman, J. S., & Smargiassi, A. (2015). Review Article: Vulnerability to Heat-related Mortality. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.