Cited by 227Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Sleep Patterns in Late Pregnancy and Risk of Preterm Birth and Fetal Growth Restriction

Micheli, Katerina, Komninos, Ioannis, Bagkeris, Emmanouel, Roumeliotaki, Theano, Koutis, Antonis, Kogevinas, Manolis, Chatzi, Leda·2011·Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, women are at particular risk for sleep deprivation and snoring because of the physiologic and hormonal changes of pregnancy. There is limited evidence for the association between sleep patterns in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. We examined the association of sleep duration and snoring in late pregnancy with the risk of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. METHODS: We used data from the prospective mother-child cohort "Rhea" study in Crete, Greece 2007-2009. The analysis included 1091 women with singleton pregnancies, providing complete data on sleeping habits at the third trimester of gestation and birth outcomes. Fetal growth restriction was based on a customized model, and multivariate log-binomial regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Women with severe snoring were at high risk for low birth weight (relative risk = 2.6 [95% confidence interval = 1.2-5.4]), and fetal-growth-restricted neonates (2.0 [1.0-3.9]) after adjusting for maternal age, education, smoking during pregnancy, and prepregnancy body mass index (BMI). Women with sleep deprivation (≤5 hours sleep) were at high risk for preterm births (1.7 [1.1-2.8]), with the highest risk observed for medically indicated preterm births (2.4 [1.0-6.4]) after adjusting for maternal age, education, parity, smoking during pregnancy, and prepregnancy BMI. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that women with severe snoring in late pregnancy have a higher risk for fetal-growth-restricted neonates; and women with sleep deprivation have a higher risk for preterm births. The mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0b013e31822546fd

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Micheli, K., Komninos, I., Bagkeris, E., Roumeliotaki, T., Koutis, A., Kogevinas, M., & Chatzi, L.
Affiliations
University of Crete (GR)
Corresponding author
Chatzi, Leda
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2011-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
738-744
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016200072
Cited by
227
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
18.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
snoring, sleep deprivation, sleep duration, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, third trimester, adverse birth outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Prospective Studies, Risk, Sleep Deprivation, Snoring, Linear Models, Premature Birth, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review