Cited by 23Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Quantitative assessment of physical activity in pregnant women with sonographic short cervix and the risk for preterm delivery: a prospective pilot study

Open access
Zemet, Roni, Schiff, Eyal, Manovitch, Zipora, Cahan, Tal, Yoeli-Ullman, Rakefet, Brandt, Benny, Hendler, Israel, Dorfman-Margolis, Lilia +3 more·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bed rest or activity restriction is a common obstetrical practice, despite a paucity of data to support its efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine whether physical activity, as assessed by a smart band activity tracker, is associated with preterm birth in pregnant women at high risk for preterm delivery. METHODS: This was a pilot prospective cohort study including pregnant women at high risk for preterm delivery between 24 and 32 weeks-of-gestation. Physical activity level was assessed by smart band activity. Patients with sonographic short cervical length (≤ 20 mm) were asked to wear the smart band activity tracker continuously for at least one week, including one weekend. Both physicians and patients were blinded to the data stored in the smart band activity tracker. No specific recommendations were given to participants as to the level or intensity of physical activity. The primary outcome was the rate of preterm birth (< 37 weeks-of-gestation). Secondary outcomes included the rate of delivery before 34 weeks of gestation and neonatal outcome. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS: Study population included 49 pregnant women: 37 women (75.7%) delivered preterm and 12 (24.5%) delivered at or after 37 weeks-of-gestation. The median steps per day was significantly lower in patients who delivered preterm (3576, IQR: 2478-4775 vs. 4554, IQR: 3632-6337, p = 0.02). Regression analysis revealed that the median number of steps per day was independently inversely associated with preterm birth, after adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, gestational age at recruitment, cervical length, cervical dilatation and plurality. CONCLUSION: This pilot study represents the first quantitative assessment of the association between physical activity and preterm birth. The results of this pilot study do not support the efficacy of decreased physical activity in the prevention of preterm birth in patients with sonographic short cervical length.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0198949

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a small pilot study, median steps per day were significantly lower in women who delivered preterm, and regression analyses found an inverse association between median steps per day and preterm birth.

    “The median number of steps per day was significantly lower in women who delivered preterm. In addition, regression analyses found an inverse association between the median number of steps per day and preterm birth.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zemet, R., Schiff, E., Manovitch, Z., Cahan, T., Yoeli-Ullman, R., Brandt, B., Hendler, I., Dorfman-Margolis, L., Yinon, Y., Sivan, E., & Mazaki-Tovi, S.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
e0198949
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808550086
Cited by
23
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashmer (20751)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
physical activity, preterm birth, short cervix, bed rest, wearable activity trackers, smart band, step count, cervical shortening, preterm birth prevention, high-risk pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Cervix Uteri, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review