Cited by 86Sleep and related disordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Health and Development

Sleeping for Two: An Open-Pilot Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Pregnancy

Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne M., Clayborne, Zahra M., Rouleau, Codie R., Campbell, Tavis S.·2017·Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Insomnia and disturbed sleep are common during pregnancy. This study investigated the effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) delivered in pregnancy. Thirteen pregnant women with insomnia participated in five weekly CBT-I group sessions. All participants completed the study and provided baseline and follow-up data. Significant reductions in insomnia symptoms and increases in subjective sleep quality were observed over the course of the study. Diary and actigraphy assessments of sleep also changed, such that participants reported less time in bed (TIB), shorter sleep onset latency (SOL), increased sleep efficiency (SE), and increased subjective total sleep time (TST). Additionally, symptoms of depression, pregnancy-specific anxiety, and fatigue all decreased over the course of treatment. Effect sizes ranged from medium to large. CBT-I delivered during pregnancy was associated with significant improvements in sleep and mood. The next step in this area of inquiry is to better establish effectiveness via a randomized controlled trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15402002.2016.1141769

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomfohr-Madsen, L. M., Clayborne, Z. M., Rouleau, C. R., & Campbell, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Published
2016-04-28
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
377-393
ISSN
  • 1540-2002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-2010
OpenAlex
W2344555961
Cited by
86
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Calgary (10008034)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, group therapy, sleep quality, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, actigraphy, depression, pregnancy-specific anxiety, fatigue, mood
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Sleep, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review