Cited by 62Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesIon channel regulation and function

Human Electrophysiological and Pharmacological Properties of XEN-D0101: A Novel Atrial-Selective Kv1.5/IKur Inhibitor

Open access
Ford, John, Milnes, James, Wettwer, Erich, Christ, Torsten, Rogers, Marc, Sutton, Kathy, Madge, David, Virag, Laszlo +5 more·2013·Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology

Abstract

The human electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of XEN-D0101 were evaluated to assess its usefulness for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). XEN-D0101 inhibited Kv1.5 with an IC50 of 241 nM and is selective over non-target cardiac ion channels (IC50 Kv4.3, 4.2 μM; hERG, 13 μM; activated Nav1.5, >100 μM; inactivated Nav1.5, 34 μM; Kir3.1/3.4, 17 μM; Kir2.1, >>100 μM). In atrial myocytes from patients in sinus rhythm (SR) and chronic AF, XEN-D0101 inhibited non-inactivating outward currents (Ilate) with IC50 of 410 and 280 nM, respectively, and peak outward currents (Ipeak) with IC50 of 806 and 240 nM, respectively. Whereas Ilate is mainly composed of IKur, Ipeak consists of IKur and Ito. Therefore, the effects on Ito alone were estimated from a double-pulse protocol where IKur was inactivated (3.5 µM IC50 in SR and 1 µM in AF). Thus, inhibition of Ipeak is because of IKur reduction and not Ito. XEN-D0101 significantly prolonged the atrial action potential duration at 20%, 50%, and 90% of repolarization (AF tissue only) and significantly elevated the atrial action potential plateau phase and increased contractility (SR and AF tissues) while having no effect on human ventricular action potentials. In healthy volunteers, XEN-D0101 did not significantly increase baseline- and placebo-adjusted QTc up to a maximum oral dose of 300 mg. XEN-D0101 is a Kv1.5/IKur inhibitor with an attractive atrial-selective profile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/fjc.0b013e31828780eb

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]4. Camm AJ, Savelieva I. Advances in antiarrhythmic drug treatment of atrial fi brillation: where do we stand now? Heart Rhythm . 2004;1:244 -246.
  2. [12]12. Nattel S. Therapeutic implications of atrial fi brillation mechanisms: can mechanistic insights be used to improve AF management? Cardiovasc Res. 2002;54:347 -360.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, J., Milnes, J., Wettwer, E., Christ, T., Rogers, M., Sutton, K., Madge, D., Virag, L., Jost, N., Horvath, Z., Matschke, K., Varro, A., & Ravens, U.
Affiliations
  • Xention (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • Herzzentrum Dresden Universitätsklinik (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Ford, John
  • Milnes, James
  • Rogers, Marc
  • Sutton, Kathy
  • Madge, David
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Published
2013-05
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
408-415
ISSN
0160-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066509395
Cited by
62
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (261057)
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA CNK-77855, OTKA K-82079)
  • Nemzeti Kutatási és Technológiai Hivatal (NKFP_07_01-RYT07_AF)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
Kv1.5, IKur, atrial fibrillation, antiarrhythmic drugs, atrial myocytes, action potential duration, hERG, cardiac sodium channel, inwardly rectifying potassium channels, QTc prolongation, atrial contractility
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Atrial Fibrillation, Cell Line, Double-Blind Method, Electrocardiography, Heart Atria, Humans, Male, Myocardial Contraction, Potassium, Pyrimidines, Thiophenes, Atrial Function, Ventricular Function, Potassium Channel Blockers, Myocytes, Cardiac, Kv1.5 Potassium Channel, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review