Cited by 49Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesReproductive Health and TechnologiesOvarian function and disorders

Bariatric surgery and fertility

Shah, Divya K, Ginsburg, Elizabeth S·2010·Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bariatric surgery is the most reliable way to sustain weight loss in the morbidly obese. Reproductive age women comprise the majority of bariatric patients, and many may be interested in conceiving after surgery. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the recent literature on bariatric surgery and fertility to assist providers in patient counseling. RECENT FINDINGS: Obesity adversely impacts fecundability and IVF outcomes through a variety of mechanisms. The body of literature on reproductive outcome after bariatric surgery is sparse and of mixed quality. Bariatric surgery has been shown to improve menstrual cyclicity in anovulatory women, but little is published on the impact of surgical weight loss on spontaneous or IVF-treatment-related pregnancy rates. The increased risk of miscarriage in obese women may decline after bariatric surgery. There are currently insufficient data to support recommendations regarding the ideal timing for pregnancy after bariatric surgery. SUMMARY: Obesity has been shown to adversely impact fertility, and weight loss is associated with significant improvement in many parameters of reproductive function. Further research is required as to the specific impact of surgical weight loss on pregnancy and miscarriage rates, as well as the optimal timing of pregnancy after bariatric surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/gco.0b013e3283373be9

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been suggested that women with a BMI >=35 kg/m2 after failed attempts at weight loss for more than 1 year may consider bariatric surgery; however, surgical studies are generally poorly designed.

    “It has been suggested that women with a BMI ⩾ 35kg/m 2 after failed attempts at weight loss for more than 1 year may consider bariatric surgery; however, surgical studies are generally poorly designed, 264”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, D. K., & Ginsburg, E. S.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ginsburg, Elizabeth S
Venue
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2010-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
248-254
ISSN
1040-872X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980632773
Cited by
49
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
bariatric surgery, fertility, obesity, weight loss, fecundability, IVF outcomes, menstrual cyclicity, anovulation, miscarriage, pregnancy after bariatric surgery, pregnancy timing, patient counseling
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Female, Fertility, Fertilization, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Female, Infertility, Male, Male, Obesity, Pregnancy, Time Factors, Pregnancy Rate, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review