Cited by 528Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHealth disparities and outcomesSodium Intake and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic status and hypertension: a meta-analysis

Leng, Bing, Jin, Yana, Li, Ge, Chen, Ling, Jin, Nan·2015·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and hypertension has been studied in a number of reviews. However, the impact of SES on hypertension has been reported in several studies with conflicting results. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Proquest and Cochrane databases for observational studies on hypertension prevalence and SES, published in English, until March 2014. Hypertension was defined as a mean SBP of at least 140 mmHg or a DBP of at least 90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication. The inverse variance method with a random-effects model was used to pool the risk estimates from the individual studies. Data abstraction was conducted independently by two authors. RESULTS: Among the 2404 references, 51 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. An overall increased risk of hypertension among the lowest SES was found for all three indicators: income [pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.48], occupation (pooled OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.64) and education (pooled OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.55-2.63). The associations were significant in high-income countries, and the increased risk of hypertension for the lowest categories of all SES indicators was most evident for women, whereas men revealed less consistent associations. CONCLUSION: Low SES is associated with higher blood pressure, and this association is particularly evident in the level of education. It is important to identify and monitor hypertension to reduce the risk of this disease among the most vulnerable groups in different countries and among different societies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000428

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Thawornchaisit, 2013, Thai Cohort Study Team. Health-risk factors and the prevalence of hypertension: cross-sectional findings from a national cohort of 87,143 Thai Open University students., Glob J Health Sci, 5, 126, 10.5539/gjhs.v5n4p126 · DOI
  2. Thompson, 2002, How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted Stat M, ed, 21, 1559

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leng, B., Jin, Y., Li, G., Chen, L., & Jin, N.
Affiliations
Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Leng, Bing
  • Jin, Yana
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2015-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
221-229
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323865490
Cited by
528
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
socioeconomic status, hypertension, income, occupational status, educational attainment, hypertension prevalence, sex differences, blood pressure, high-income countries
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Income, Risk, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review