The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supporting self-management for people with hypertension: a meta-review of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Globally, healthcare policy promotes supported self-management as a strategy for people with long-term conditions. This meta-review aimed to explore how people with hypertension make sense of their condition, to assess the effectiveness of supported self-management in hypertension, and to identify effective components of support. METHODS: From a search of eight databases (January 1993-October 2012; update June 2017) we included systematic syntheses of qualitative studies of patients' experiences, and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of supported self-management on blood pressure and medication adherence. We used meta-ethnography, meta-Forest plots and narrative analysis to synthesise the data. RESULTS: Six qualitative and 29 quantitative reviews provided data from 98 and 446 unique studies, respectively. Self-management support consistently reduced SBP (by between 2 and 6 mmHg), and DBP (by between 1 and 5 mmHg). Information about hypertension and treatment, home BP monitoring (HBPM) and feedback (including telehealth) were widely used in effective interventions. Patients' perceptions of a disease with multiple symptoms contrasted with the professional view of an asymptomatic condition. HBPM, in the context of a supportive patient-professional relationship, changed perceptions of the significance of symptoms and fostered confidence in ability to self-manage hypertension. CONCLUSION: Our systematic qualitative and quantitative meta-reviews tell complementary stories. Supported self-management can improve blood pressure control. Interventions are complex and encompass a broad range of support strategies. HBPM (with or without telehealth) within the context of a supportive patient-professional partnership can bridge the gap between medical and lay perspectives of hypertension and enable effective self-management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is in line with other reviews that have shown similar improvements in hypertension [168] and type 2 diabetes self-management [169] after telemonitoring interventions.”
From Interactive Remote Patient Monitoring Devices for Managing Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [168]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Foreman, K., Lim, S., Shibuya, K., Aboyans, V., Abraham, J., Adair, T., Aggarwal, R., Ahn, S. Y., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61728-0 · Cited by 14,070
Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030
Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 · Cited by 11,386
Law, M. R., Morris, J. K., & Wald, N. J. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1665 · Cited by 2,775
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 · Cited by 2,045 · cited 2×
“We undertook a prepublication check in April 2018 using the ‘efficient and effective’ approach of forward citation of all included reviews using Google Scholar [20].”
Olsen, M. H., Angell, S. Y., Asma, S., Boutouyrie, P., Burger, D. E., Chirinos, J. A., Damasceno, A. A. M., Delles, C., Gimenez‐Roqueplo, A., Hering, D., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31134-5 · Cited by 970
Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults
Chodosh, J., Morton, S. C., Mojica, W., Maglione, M., Suttorp, M. J., Hilton, L., Rhodes, S., & Shekelle, P. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007 · Cited by 790 · cited 2×
“Home BP monitoring [28,31,35,36,42,46,48,50], was often mediated by telehealth [27,29,32,34,37,41,43,52,53], and in some reviews also included monitoring of medication intake,weight, physical activity, and smoking [40,52].”
Dickinson, H. O., Mason, J. M., Nicolson, D. J., Campbell, F., Beyer, F. R., Cook, J. V., Williams, B., & Ford, G. A. (2006) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000199800.72563.26 · Cited by 759
Viswanathan, M., Golin, C. E., Jones, C. D., Ashok, M., Blalock, S. J., Wines, R. C. M., Coker-Schwimmer, E. J. L., Rosen, D. L., Sista, P., & Lohr, K. N. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00538 · Cited by 754
Tucker, K. L., Sheppard, J. P., Stevens, R., Bosworth, H. B., Bove, A., Bray, E. P., Earle, K., George, J., Godwin, M., Green, B. B., et al. (2017) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002389 · Cited by 658
Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions
Foster, G., Taylor, S. J., Eldridge, S. M., Ramsay, J., & Griffiths, C. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005108.pub2 · Cited by 596
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kung, 2010, From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based healthcare: validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (R-AMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance, Open Dentistry J, 4, 84
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smartphone Apps to Support Self-Management of Hypertension: Review and Content Analysis
Alessa, T., Hawley, M. S., Hock, E. S., & de Witte, L. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/13645 · Cited by 170
Captieux, M., Pearce, G., Parke, H. L., Epiphaniou, E., Wild, S., Taylor, S. J. C., & Pinnock, H. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024262 · Cited by 132
Self-citationSiopis, G., Moschonis, G., Eweka, E., Jung, J., Kwasnicka, D., Asare, B. Y.-A., Kodithuwakku, V., Willems, R., Verhaeghe, N., Annemans, L., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00002-x · Cited by 87
Boima, V., Doku, A., Agyekum, F., Tuglo, L. S., & Agyemang, C. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102432 · Cited by 82
Leo, D. G., Buckley, B. J. R., Chowdhury, M., Harrison, S. L., Isanejad, M., Lip, G. Y. H., Wright, D. J., Lane, D. A., & the TAILOR investigators (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/35508 · Cited by 62
Zhang, W., Cheng, B., Zhu, W., Huang, X., & Shen, C. (2021) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0122 · Cited by 55
Hui, C. Y., McKinstry, B., Fulton, O., Buchner, M., & Pinnock, H. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22432 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahaj, O., Denneny, D., Schwappach, A., Pearce, G., Epiphaniou, E., Parke, H. L., Taylor, S. J. C., & Pinnock, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Public Health Wales (GB)
- Coventry University (GB)
- University of Nicosia (CY)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pinnock, Hilary
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264-279
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883396782
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Scottish Government
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (11/1014/04)
- Department of Health and Social Care (11/1014/04)
- Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (11/1014/04)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- hypertension, self-management support, home blood pressure monitoring, telemedicine, medication adherence, blood pressure control, patient-professional relationship, chronic disease, self-management interventions
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Telemedicine, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
