CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringClinical practice guidelines implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STRIDE BP: an international initiative for accurate blood pressure measurement

Stergiou, George S., O’Brien, Eoin, Myers, Martin, Palatini, Paolo, Parati, Gianfranco·2020·Journal of Hypertension
DOI 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002289
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of hypertension is dependent upon accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement. Despite intense efforts over several decades by the international medical community worldwide, the use of inaccurate devices has resulted in the misdiagnosis and poor management of hypertension, which remains a largely unresolved public health problem. STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) is an international nonprofit organization the mission of which is to improve the accuracy of BP measurement and the diagnosis of hypertension. STRIDE BP comprises a group of 24 recognized experts in BP monitoring from across the world and operates in affiliation with the European Society of Hypertension, the International Society of Hypertension, and the World Hypertension League. In the first stage, STRIDE BP has reviewed 419 validations of 260 devices and approved 69% of them, providing recommendations on accurate devices for office, ambulatory and home BP measurement in adults, children and during pregnancy. At the next stage, STRIDE BP intends to develop programs for on-line training and tools for use in clinical practice leading to improved measurement of BP and better diagnosis of hypertension world-wide.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002289

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Yusuf, 2015, The World Heart Federation's vision for worldwide cardiovascular disease prevention, Lancet, 386, 399, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60265-3 · DOI
  2. Lim, 2012, A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, Lancet, 380, 2224, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. O’Brien, 2018, The quest for accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 20, 1092, 10.1111/jch.13279 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Stergiou, 2018, Validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices in the 21st century, J Clin Hypertens, 20, 1096, 10.1111/jch.13294 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Stergiou, 2019, STRIDE BP international initiative for accurate blood pressure measurement: systematic review of published validation studies of blood pressure measuring devices, J Clin Hypertens, 10.1111/jch.13710 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Stergiou, 2018, A Universal Standard for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement, Hypertension, 71, 368, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237 · DOI · Paper page
  7. O’Brien, 2019, Validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices: the impact of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol and the development of a Universal Standard, Blood Press Monit, 24, 163, 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000391 · DOI · Paper page
  8. O’Brien, 2018, Achieving reliable blood pressure measurements in clinical practice: It's time to meet the challenge, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 20, 1084, 10.1111/jch.13323 · DOI
  9. O’Brien, 2018, Accurate blood pressure measuring devices: influencing users in the 21st century, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 20, 1138, 10.1111/jch.13278 · DOI
  10. Atkins, 2007, The dabl Educational Trust device equivalence procedure, Blood Press Monit, 12, 245, 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32809efa27 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stergiou, G. S., O’Brien, E., Myers, M., Palatini, P., & Parati, G.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
Corresponding author
Stergiou, George S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2020-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
395-399
ISSN
  • 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5598
DOI
10.1097/hjh.0000000000002289
OpenAlex
W2984251926
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N025342/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
blood pressure measurement, hypertension diagnosis, blood pressure monitors, device validation, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, home blood pressure monitoring, office blood pressure measurement, children, online training
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Child, Humans, Hypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review