Efficacy and safety of OTX-101, a novel nanomicellar formulation of cyclosporine A, for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca: pooled analysis of a phase 2b/3 and phase 3 study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: OTX-101 (CEQUA™) is approved in the United States for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). This pooled analysis of 2 studies (phase 2b/3 and phase 3) evaluates the efficacy and safety of OTX-101 0.09% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the subgroup of patients with a baseline Schirmer score less than 10 mm. METHODS: In these randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled studies, patients received 1 drop of either OTX-101 or vehicle in both eyes twice daily. A Schirmer's test was performed at baseline and day 84/early discontinuation. Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) scores and adverse events were monitored at each visit. RESULTS: The pooled analysis included 523 and 525 patients randomized to OTX-101 0.09% and vehicle, respectively. In the ITT population, 16.6% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and 9.0% of eyes receiving vehicle showed a day 84 increase in Schirmer score ≥10 mm from baseline (P<0.0001). In the subgroup with Schirmer score less than 10 mm at baseline, 18.7% and 10.2% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and vehicle, respectively, exhibited this outcome (P=0.0001). The mean (SD) percent change from baseline in global SANDE scores on day 84 in the ITT population was -29.0% (39.0%) and -30.4% (39.5%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. In the subgroup, the mean (SD) percent change was -27.3% (39.7%) and -31.4% (38.3%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: OTX-101 improved tear production compared with vehicle. Both OTX-101 and vehicle showed improved SANDE scores over baseline. OTX-101 was well tolerated in patients with KCS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 2015-2016 Phase IIb trial confirmed the dose-dependent efficacy of 0.09% CsA.
“The 2015–2016 Phase IIb trial confirmed the dose-dependent efficacy of 0.09 % CsA [211].”
From From design to Deployment: The innovative role of nanomicelles in targeted ophthalmic therapeutics (2025) · cites this paper as [211]
Cites
TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report
Stapleton, F. J., Alves, M., Bunya, V. Y., Jalbert, I., Lekhanont, K., Malet, F., Na, K., Schaumberg, D. A., Uchino, M., Vehof, J., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 · Cited by 2,654 · see citing works
TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report
Wolffsohn, J. S., Arita, R., Chalmers, R. L., Djalilian, A. R., Doğru, M., Dumbleton, K., Gupta, P. K., Karpecki, P. M., Lazreg, S., Pult, H., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001 · Cited by 2,139 · see citing works
TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report
Bron, A. J., de Paiva, C. S., Chauhan, S. K., Bonini, S., Gabison, E. E., Jain, S. K., Knop, E., Markoulli, M. P., Ogawa, Y., Perez, V. L., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011 · Cited by 1,869 · see citing works
TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report
Jones, L., Downie, L. E., Korb, D. R., Benitez-del-Castillo, J., Dana, R., Deng, S. X., Dong, P. N., Geerling, G., Hida, R. Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Sall, K. N., Stevenson, D., Mundorf, T. K., & Reis, B. L. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00176-1 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary
Craig, J. P., Nelson, J. D., Azar, D. T., Belmonte, C., Bron, A. J., Chauhan, S. K., de Paiva, C. S., Gomes, J. Á. P., Hammitt, K. M., Jones, L., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.08.003 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine.
Matsuda, S., & Koyasu, S. (2000) · Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0162-3109(00)00192-2 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
The Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
Messmer, E. S. B. M. (2015) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0071 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Cyclosporine A delivery to the eye: A pharmaceutical challenge
Lallemand, F., Felt-Baeyens, O., Besseghir, K., Béhar‐Cohen, F., & Gurny, R. (2003) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/s0939-6411(03)00138-3 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Cyclosporine A delivery to the eye: A comprehensive review of academic and industrial efforts
Lallemand, F., Schmitt, M., Bourges, J., Gurny, R., Benita, S., & Garrigue, J. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.03.006 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Review: The Lacrimal Gland and Its Role in Dry Eye
Conrady, C. D., Joos, Z. P., & Patel, B. C. K. (2016) · Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1155/2016/7542929 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Controlled ocular drug delivery with nanomicelles
Vaishya, R. D., Khurana, V., Patel, S. P., & Mitra, A. K. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1272 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Goldberg, D. F., Malhotra, R. P., Schechter, B. A., Justice, A., Weiss, S. L., & Sheppard, J. D. (2019) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.050 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationTopical, aqueous, clear cyclosporine formulation design for anterior and posterior ocular delivery
Cholkar, K., Gilger, B. C., & Mitra, A. K. (2015) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.4.3.1 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Tauber, J., Schechter, B. A., Bacharach, J., Toyos, M. M., Smyth-Medina, R., Weiss, S. L., & Luchs, J. I. (2018) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s175065 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationCyclosporine A Formulation Affects Its Ocular Distribution in Rabbits
Kuwano, M., Ibuki, H., Morikawa, N., Ota, A., & Kawashima, Y. (2002) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1013671819604 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Monchy, I. D., Gendron, G., Miceli‐Richard, C., Pogorzalek, N., Xavier Mariette, A., & Labétoulle, M. (2011) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6671 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Malhotra, R., Devries, D. K., Luchs, J., Kabat, A. G., Schechter, B. A., Lee, B. S., Shettle, L., Smyth-Medina, R. J., Ogundele, A., Darby, C. H., et al. (2019) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001989 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationRhee, M. K., & Mah, F. S. (2017) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s113437 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periman, L. M., Mah, F. S., & Karpecki, P. M. (2020) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s279051 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Management of inflammation in dry eye disease: Recommendations from a European panel of experts
Messmer, E. S. B. M., Ahmad, S., del Castillo, J. M. B., Mrukwa–Kominek, E., Rolando, M., Вітовська, О. П., Baudouin, C., & experts, O. B. O. A. P. O. E. D. E. D. (2022) · European Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1177/11206721221141481 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Terreni, E., Zucchetti, E., Tampucci, S., Burgalassi, S., Monti, D., & Chetoni, P. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13020192 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Su, Y., Fan, X., & Pang, Y. (2023) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d3bm00505d · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Jerkins, G. W., Pattar, G. R., & Kannarr, S. R. (2020) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s228070 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent Advances in Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
Coco, G., Buffon, G., Taloni, A., & Giannaccare, G. (2024) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano14080669 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Emerging therapies for dry eye disease
Mason, L., Jafri, S., Dortonne, I., & Sheppard, J. D. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs · doi:10.1080/14728214.2021.2011858 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationMultidimensional immunotherapy for dry eye disease: current status and future directions
Huang, D., & Li, Z. (2024) · Frontiers in Ophthalmology · doi:10.3389/fopht.2024.1449283 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lee, B. S., Toyos, M. M., Karpecki, P. M., Schiffbauer, J., & Sheppard, J. D. (2022) · Ophthalmology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40123-022-00516-9 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent advances in drug treatments for dry eye disease
Coco, G., Ambrosini, G., Poletti, S., Meliante, L. A., Taloni, A., Scorcia, V., & Giannaccare, G. (2023) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2023.2269090 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Topical pharmacologic treatments for dry eye disease: A systematic review
Tong, L. H. T., Liu, Z., Şahin, A., Gümüş, K., Messmer, E. S. B. M., Benitez-del-Castillo, J. M., Labétoulle, M., Chan, C. C., & Periman, L. M. (2025) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2025.07.010 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Sheppard, J. D., Bergmann, M. T., Schechter, B. A., Luchs, J., Ogundele, A., & Karpecki, P. M. (2021) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s279364 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationRole of topical and systemic immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease
Kate, A., Shanbhag, S. S., Donthineni, P. R., Amescua, G., Quinones, V. L. P., & Basu, S. (2023) · Indian Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_2818_22 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Current and emerging pharmacological treatment options for patients with dry eye disease
Cukurova, F., Coco, G., Lixi, F., & Giannaccare, G. (2025) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2025.2543380 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Toyos, M. M., Gupta, P. K., Mitchell, B., & Karpecki, P. M. (2021) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713683.2021.1966477 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
BURADE, V. S., Zalawadia, R., Patel, A. R., & Ogundele, A. (2020) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s259331 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Topical Cyclosporine A in Ocular Surface Inflammatory Disorders
Doctor, M. B., Kate, A., Tallapelly, H. G., & Basu, S. (2025) · Seminars in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1080/08820538.2025.2512759 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Schechter, B. A., Urbieta, M., Bacharach, J., Toyos, M. M., Smyth-Medina, R. J., Mitchell, B., & Luchs, J. (2022) · Clinical ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s392315 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom design to Deployment: The innovative role of nanomicelles in targeted ophthalmic therapeutics
Sun, M., Wang, J., Fan, W., Wang, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Ding, S., Zhang, C., Feng, Z., Wang, Y.-G., et al. (2025) · Materials today. Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102537 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The 2015 – 2016 Phase IIb trial confirmed the dose-dependent efficacy of 0.09 % CsA [211].”
InfluentialFahmy, A. M., Ahmed, M., Pflugfelder, S. C., Serikbaeva, A., & Tsao, F.-W. (2025) · Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/jop.2024.0192 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nano Carrier-Mediated Ocular Therapeutic Delivery: A Comprehensive Review
Parameshwar, K., & Samal, H. B. (2024) · Current Nanomedicine · doi:10.2174/0124681873336214241214043549 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Questionnaire Design and Use to Assess Dry Eye Disease
Wolffsohn, J. S. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-82753-9.00006-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Goldberg, D. F. (2020) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.048
Rolando, M., del Castillo, J. M. B., Cebollero, M. A., & Messmer, E. S. B. M. (2025) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-025-07054-7
Lortie-Milner, É., Michaud, L., Dubois, M., & Boissy, P. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09521-w
Topical cyclosporine A formulations in ophthalmology: a literature review
Trufanov, S. V., & Riks, I. A. (2026) · The EYE GLAZ · doi:10.33791/2222-4408-2026-1-56-64
Rahman, A., Kushwaha, P., Ray, B., & Yadav, S. (2026) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/s12249-026-03420-8
Cyclosporin (0.09%) Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease – A Narrative Review
Basu, S., Messmer, E. S. B. M., Figueiredo, F. C., Geerling, G., Singh, S., Kate, A., Fatima, Z., Mane, A., Shaikh, A., & Mehta, S. C. (2026) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713683.2026.2702223
- Authors
- Sheppard, J., Kannarr, S., Luchs, J., Malhotra, R., Justice, A., Ogundele, A., Darby, C., & Bacharach, J.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Eye Consultants (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sheppard, John
- Venue
- Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- S14-S19
- ISSN
- 0733-8902 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2321
- OpenAlex
- W2966827320
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
- Keywords
- cyclosporine, dry eye, tear secretion, ocular drug delivery, adverse events, vehicle comparison, pooled analysis, treatment efficacy and safety, eye drops
- MeSH terms
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, Male, Middle Aged, Ophthalmic Solutions, Tears, Cyclosporine, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review