Cited by 27Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessMedication Adherence and Compliance

Does the Length of the First Antidepressant Treatment Episode Influence Risk and Time to a Second Episode?

Gardarsdottir, Helga, van Geffen, Erica C.G., Stolker, Joost J., Egberts, Toine C.G., Heerdink, Eibert R.·2009·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Antidepressant treatment in primary care is inconsistent with treatment recommendations, and many patients discontinue treatment within 6 months. How this affects treatment outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess how length of the first antidepressant episode influences risk and time to a second treatment episode within 5 years.The study population included 9423 adults (67% women; mean age, 47.3 years) who initiated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in 1998 or 1999. Based on the length of the first antidepressant treatment episode, patients were divided into early discontinuers (<6 months), continuing users (6-12 months), and persistent users (>12 months). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for the association between the length of the first antidepressant treatment episode and time to reinitiating antidepressant treatment.Time to a second treatment episode did not differ significantly between continuing users and early discontinuers (RR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.07). Persistent users showed a higher risk of experiencing a second treatment episode than early discontinuers (RR, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.32).In conclusion, the risk of experiencing a second antidepressant treatment episode did not differ for those who used antidepressants for 6 to 12 months and those who discontinued early. In general, there is limited information on how length of an antidepressant treatment episode influences the risk of reinitiating treatment of patients in primary care. More research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of antidepressant drug treatment patterns in preventing relapse or recurrence in primary care populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e31819302b1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardarsdottir, H., van Geffen, E. C. G., Stolker, J. J., Egberts, T. C. G., & Heerdink, E. R.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Stolker, Joost J.
  • Egberts, Toine C.G.
  • Heerdink, Eibert R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2009-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
69-72
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079846272
Cited by
27
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
antidepressant treatment duration, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressant discontinuation, relapse, recurrence, primary care, depression, treatment patterns
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Treatment Refusal, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review