Cited by 79Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Modular psychotherapy for anxiety in older primary care patients

Open access
Wetherell, Julie Loebach, Ayers, Catherine R., Sorrell, John T., Thorp, Steven R., Nuevo, Roberto, Belding, Wendy, Gray, Emily, Stanley, Melinda A. +6 more·2009·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To develop and test a modular psychotherapy protocol in older primary care patients with anxiety disorders.Design Randomized, controlled pilot study.Setting University-based geriatric medicine clinics.Participants Thirty-one elderly primary care patients with generalized anxiety disorder or anxiety disorder not otherwise specified.Intervention Modular form of psychotherapy compared with enhanced community treatment.Measurements Self-reported, interviewer-rated, and qualitative assessments of anxiety, worry, depression, and mental health-related quality of life.Results Both groups showed substantial improvements in anxiety symptoms, worry, depressive symptoms, and mental health-related quality of life. Most individuals in the enhanced community treatment condition reported receiving medications or some other form of professional treatment for anxiety. Across both conditions, individuals who reported major life events or stressors and those who used involvement in activities as a coping strategy made smaller gains than those who did not.Conclusions Results suggest that modular psychotherapy and other treatments can be effective for anxiety in older primary care patients. Results further suggest that life events and coping through increased activity may play a role in the maintenance of anxiety in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181a31fb5

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standard CBT manuals for GAD in older people typically include sessions on problem-solving and sleep hygiene in recognition that some older people with GAD may have poor problem-solving skills or poor sleeping habits.

    “Standard CBT manuals for GAD in older people typically include sessions on problem-solving and sleep hygiene in recognition of the fact that some older people with GAD may have poor problem-solving skills, or poor sleeping habits.21,24,80”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for older people with treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder: The FACTOID feasibility study (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

    Methods > Procedures describes sleep-hygiene guidelines and problem-solving skills training in this study’s modular protocol for older patients with GAD or ADNOS. It does not establish that standard CBT manuals typically include both, or state that they do so because some older people with GAD have poor problem-solving skills or sleeping habits. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A 12-week waiting period was used to control for natural recovery.

    “A 12-week waiting period between randomization and the start of treatment was designed to control for potential natural recovery, which our team observed in a previous investigation (Wetherell et al., 2009).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: a preliminary report. (2011) · cites this paper as Wetherell et al., 2009

    The source’s Conclusions (page unavailable) report symptomatic improvement in both the psychotherapy and enhanced-community-treatment groups, which supports the citing authors’ observation of improvement outside their psychotherapy arm. But the Methods (Procedures) and Conclusions say community-treatment patients could receive medication or other care; the study does not establish that their improvement was natural recovery. The 12-week waiting period is the citing authors’ own design, not a feature attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many CBT anxiety interventions are tailored to specific subpopulations, such as older adults with generalized anxiety disorder or adults with cardiac or pulmonary disease.

    “For instance, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) anxiety interventions have performed well in primary care, but many are too time-intensive at 8-12 sessions and/or tailored to specific subpopulations, such as older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (Stanley et al., 2009; Wetherell et al., 2009) or adults with cardiac or pulmonary disease (Cully et al., 2017).”
  • This replicates previous findings that older GAD patients may improve over time regardless of treatment.

    “This replicates our team’s previous findings that older GAD patients may improve over time regardless of treatment (Wetherell et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wetherell, J. L., Ayers, C. R., Sorrell, J. T., Thorp, S. R., Nuevo, R., Belding, W., Gray, E., Stanley, M. A., Areán, P. A., Donohue, M., Unützer, J., Ramsdell, J., Xu, R., & Patterson, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Mateo Medical Center (US)
  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Wetherell, Julie Loebach
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
483-492
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997503859
Cited by
78
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH067643, MH067643)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anxiety disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, older adults, primary care, geriatric mental health, depression, mental health-related quality of life, worry, life events, coping strategies, anxiety maintenance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Primary Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review