Cited by 134Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health and PsychiatryHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Classification of Neurocognitive Disorders in DSM-5: A Work in Progress

Open access
Ganguli, Mary, Blacker, Deborah, Blazer, Dan G., Grant, Igor, Jeste, Dilip V., Paulsen, Jane S., Petersen, Ronald C., Sachdev, Perminder S.·2011·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3182051ab4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The final criteria were reviewed by several DSM-5 panels, including a scientific review committee, a clinical and public health review committee, the Task Force, and a summit body, before approval by the APA Board of Trustees.

    “The final cri teria were reviewed by several overarching DSM-5 panels, including a scientific review committee, a clinical and public health review committee, the Task Force, and a summit body, before final approval was granted by the APA Board of Trustees.5”

    From Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach (2014) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ganguli, M., Blacker, D., Blazer, D. G., Grant, I., Jeste, D. V., Paulsen, J. S., Petersen, R. C., & Sachdev, P. S.
Affiliations
  • American Psychiatric Association (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Blazer, Dan G.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
205-210
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002949133
Cited by
134
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG012765)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
neurocognitive disorders, DSM-5, diagnostic classification, cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Humans, Advisory Committees, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review