Cited by 32Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesAir Quality and Health ImpactsTraffic and Road Safety

High Gasoline Prices and Mortality From Motor Vehicle Crashes and Air Pollution

Leigh, J Paul, Geraghty, Estella M.·2008·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of increasing gas prices on mortality. METHOD: We developed a simulation-based partial equilibrium model that estimated the public health effects of a 20% rise in gas prices. Estimates on price elasticity for gasoline, price elasticity of motor vehicle crashes, relations among gasoline use, air pollution, and mortality were drawn from literature in economics, epidemiology, and medicine. RESULTS: For sustained 20% increases in gasoline prices over 1 year, and assuming other prices and factors were constant, we estimated: 1994 (range, 997 to 4984) fewer deaths from vehicle crashes and 600 (range, 300 to 1500) fewer deaths from air pollution. Combining both, we estimated 2594 fewer deaths. A Monte Carlo simulation involving varying assumptions on elasticities and relations indicated that 95% of the combined reduction in deaths was between 1747 and 3714. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that high gas prices have public health implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e318162f5c4

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leigh, J. P., & Geraghty, E. M.
Affiliations
University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Leigh, J Paul
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2008-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
249-254
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151489441
Cited by
32
References
48
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
  • U.S. Public Health Service (D55 HP00232)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (R01 OH008248-02)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
gasoline prices, traffic accidents, traffic fatalities, air pollution, mortality, price elasticity, gasoline consumption, public health impact, partial equilibrium model, Monte Carlo simulation
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Vehicle Emissions, Commerce, Computer Simulation, Gasoline, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, United States, Models, Econometric, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review