Cited by 335Environmental Impact and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesAir Quality and Health Impacts

Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline

Open access
Hill, Jason, Polasky, Stephen, Nelson, Erik, Tilman, David, Huo, Hong, Ludwig, Lindsay, Neumann, James, Zheng, Haochi +1 more·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Environmental impacts of energy use can impose large costs on society. We quantify and monetize the life-cycle climate-change and health effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) emissions from gasoline, corn ethanol, and cellulosic ethanol. For each billion ethanol-equivalent gallons of fuel produced and combusted in the US, the combined climate-change and health costs are $469 million for gasoline, $472–952 million for corn ethanol depending on biorefinery heat source (natural gas, corn stover, or coal) and technology, but only $123–208 million for cellulosic ethanol depending on feedstock (prairie biomass, Miscanthus , corn stover, or switchgrass). Moreover, a geographically explicit life-cycle analysis that tracks PM 2.5 emissions and exposure relative to U.S. population shows regional shifts in health costs dependent on fuel production systems. Because cellulosic ethanol can offer health benefits from PM 2.5 reduction that are of comparable importance to its climate-change benefits from GHG reduction, a shift from gasoline to cellulosic ethanol has greater advantages than previously recognized. These advantages are critically dependent on the source of land used to produce biomass for biofuels, on the magnitude of any indirect land use that may result, and on other as yet unmeasured environmental impacts of biofuels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0812835106

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results for corn ethanol contrast with those of Searchinger et al (2008) and Hill et al (2009), who predicted that corn ethanol would have a greater life-cycle GHG impact than gasoline, mainly due to LUC GHG emissions.

    “Our results for corn ethanol, however, contrast with those of Searchinger et al (2008) and Hill et al (2009), who predicted that corn ethanol would have a greater life-cycle GHG impact than gasoline, mainly due to LUC GHG emissions among those studies and ours.”

    From Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use (2012) · cites this paper as Hill et al (2009)

    The Results (page unavailable) say that land-use-change emissions eliminate the GHG advantage of corn ethanol made with natural-gas process heat, and that coal-powered production has higher GHG emissions than gasoline. But the paper does not predict higher emissions for corn ethanol generally: it reports lower emissions for the stover-powered and advanced-technology scenarios, even with land-use change included in the latter. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Soil organic carbon equilibrium seems to occur after about 100 years for switchgrass and 50 years for miscanthus.

    “Equilibrium seems to occur after about 100 years in the case of switchgrass (Andress 2002) and 50 years in the case of miscanthus (Hill et al 2009, Scown et al 2012).”

    From Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use (2012) · cites this paper as Hill et al 2009

    Hill et al. is cited for the miscanthus portion of the sentence, not the switchgrass estimate attributed to Andress. The Methods discuss miscanthus yields and fertilizer rates, but our copy gives no time to soil organic carbon equilibrium; searches for “50 years,” “soil carbon accumulation,” and “equilibrium” found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The estimate of LUC GHG emissions for corn ethanol has decreased substantially compared to earlier studies.

    “However, the estimate of LUC GHG emissions for this fuel has decreased substantially compared to earlier studies [1,2,11,12,36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Energy Information Administration. Monthly Energy Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy; 2008. DOE/EIA-0035(2008/03) [Google Scholar]
  2. [12]U.S. EPA. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1999. EPA-410-R-99–001. [Google Scholar]
  3. [16]Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook. Ames, IA: Staff Report 08-FSR 1; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. [17]Wang M. “GREET”. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory; 2007. ANL/ESD/05–03. [Google Scholar]
  5. [18]Dooley J, et al. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage. College Park, MD: Global Energy Technology Strategy Program; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. [26]National Research Council. Estimating Mortality Risk Reduction and Economic Benefits from Controlling Ozone Air Pollution. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [30]Renewable Fuels Association. Ethanol Biorefinery Locations. Washington, DC: Renewable Fuels Association; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. [40]Mueller S. An analysis of the projected energy use of future dry mill corn ethanol plants (2010-2030) University of Illinois, Chicago, IL: Energy Resources Center; 2007. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, J., Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Huo, H., Ludwig, L., Neumann, J., Zheng, H., & Bonta, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Industrial Economics, Cambridge, MA 02140
  • Department of Applied Economics,
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-02-10
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
2077-2082
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2168129126
Cited by
335
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 30
FWCI
32.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bowdoin - Digital Commons (Bowdoin College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
biofuels, cellulosic ethanol, corn ethanol, gasoline, greenhouse gas emissions, PM2.5, health care costs, economic costs of climate change, life cycle assessment, biomass feedstock, corn stover, Miscanthus, switchgrass, energy policy
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Ethanol, Vehicle Emissions, Energy-Generating Resources, Gasoline, Humans, Health Care Costs, Greenhouse Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review