Cited by 26Smoking Behavior and CessationWorkplace Health and Well-beingHealth Policy Implementation Science

Application of the RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate the Impact of a Worksite-Based Financial Incentive Intervention for Smoking Cessation

Kim, Annice E., Towers, Angela, Renaud, Jeanette, Zhu, Jingsan, Shea, Judy A., Galvin, Robert, Volpp, Kevin G.·2012·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To apply the RE-AIM framework to examine factors that may have influenced the impact of a financial incentive smoking cessation intervention delivered at General Electric (GE) worksites. METHODS: Intervention reach and efficacy were examined alone and in combination across worksites. Telephone interviews were conducted with worksite staff to explore organizational-level factors that may have influenced program adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Focus groups were conducted with employees to explore barriers and facilitators to program participation. RESULTS: Intervention impact varied considerably across GE business industries when reach and efficacy both were examined instead of efficacy alone. Barriers that may have hindered program success include time constraints, competing priorities, work stress, and the lack of public visibility. CONCLUSION: Employers considering financial incentive interventions for smoking cessation should examine how organizational context and real-world constraints may influence differential impact across sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e31824b2171

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Financial incentives may act as a universal, simple, adaptable, alternative reinforcer.

    “Since many health-compromising behaviours have benefits that may vary across individuals, financial incentives may act as a universal, simple, adaptable, alternative reinforcer (Halpern et al., 2011; John et al., 2011, 2012; Kim et al., 2012; Kimmel et al., 2012; Kullgren et al., 2013; Loewenstein et al., 2013; Shea et al., 2012; Volpp et al., 2008, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, A. E., Towers, A., Renaud, J., Zhu, J., Shea, J. A., Galvin, R., & Volpp, K. G.
Affiliations
RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Annice E.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2012-05
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
610-614
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316066166
Cited by
26
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
smoking cessation, financial incentives, workplace health promotion, RE-AIM framework, organizational context, barriers and facilitators, employee participation, occupational stress
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Time Factors, Organizational Culture, Program Evaluation, Occupational Health, Workload, Smoking Cessation, Workplace, Focus Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review