Cited by 836Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation

Open access
Volpp, Kevin G., Troxel, Andrea B., Pauly, Mark V., Glick, Henry A., Puig, Andrea, Asch, David A., Galvin, Robert, Zhu, Jingsan +5 more·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking is the leading preventable cause of premature death in the United States. Previous studies of financial incentives for smoking cessation in work settings have not shown that such incentives have significant effects on cessation rates, but these studies have had limited power, and the incentives used may have been insufficient. METHODS: We randomly assigned 878 employees of a multinational company based in the United States to receive information about smoking-cessation programs (442 employees) or to receive information about programs plus financial incentives (436 employees). The financial incentives were $100 for completion of a smoking-cessation program, $250 for cessation of smoking within 6 months after study enrollment, as confirmed by a biochemical test, and $400 for abstinence for an additional 6 months after the initial cessation, as confirmed by a biochemical test. Individual participants were stratified according to work site, heavy or nonheavy smoking, and income. The primary end point was smoking cessation 9 or 12 months after enrollment, depending on whether initial cessation was reported at 3 or 6 months. Secondary end points were smoking cessation within the first 6 months after enrollment and rates of participation in and completion of smoking-cessation programs. RESULTS: The incentive group had significantly higher rates of smoking cessation than did the information-only group 9 or 12 months after enrollment (14.7% vs. 5.0%, P<0.001) and 15 or 18 months after enrollment (9.4% vs. 3.6%, P<0.001). Incentive-group participants also had significantly higher rates of enrollment in a smoking-cessation program (15.4% vs. 5.4%, P<0.001), completion of a smoking-cessation program (10.8% vs. 2.5%, P<0.001), and smoking cessation within the first 6 months after enrollment (20.9% vs. 11.8%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of employees of one large company, financial incentives for smoking cessation significantly increased the rates of smoking cessation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00128375.)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa0806819

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiments testing financial incentives to improve health behaviors demonstrate that financial incentives can improve health behaviors in the short term, especially when financial incentives are larger.

    “These studies demonstrate that financial incentives can improve health behaviors in the short term, especially when financial incentives are larger.216–219”
  • Incentives led to greater participation and completion rates, successful cessation in smoking cessation programs at 3 months, and greater weight loss ranging from 0.9 to 2.25 kg at 3 months, but these differences generally did not persist at longer follow-up (e.g., 6 months) after completion of the incentive programs.

    “Generally, incentives led to greater participation and completion rates, successful cessation in smoking cessation programs at 3 months, and greater weight loss ranging from 0.9 to 2.25 kg at 3 months. However, these differences generally did not persist at longer follow-up (eg, 6 months) after completion of the incentive programs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55:1145-8.
  2. ity, years of potential life lost, and eco- nomic costs -United States, 1995-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51: 300-3. Pauly MV. Health benefits at work: an 24. economic and political analysis of employ- ment-based health insurance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.
  3. Aakko E, Piasecki TM, Remington P, 26. Fiore MC. Smoking cessation services of- fered by health insurance plans for Wis- consin state employees. WMJ 1999;98: 14-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volpp, K. G., Troxel, A. B., Pauly, M. V., Glick, H. A., Puig, A., Asch, D. A., Galvin, R., Zhu, J., Wan, F., DeGuzman, J., Corbett, E., Weiner, J., & Audrain-McGovern, J.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • General Electric (United States) (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-02-12
Volume
360
Issue
7
Pages
699-709
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2393834324
Cited by
836
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 54
FWCI
31.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (R01 DP000100-01, R01 DP001168-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, financial incentives, workplace health promotion, smoking cessation interventions, abstinence, multinational company employees
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, United States, Program Evaluation, Occupational Health, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review