Cited by 37Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Feeding should be individualized in the critically ill patients

Open access
Berger, Mette M., Pichard, Claude·2019·Current Opinion in Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose of review: Any critical care therapy requires individual adaptation, despite standardization of the concepts supporting them. Among these therapies, nutrition care has been repeatedly shown to influence clinical outcome. Individualized feeding is the next needed step towards optimal global critical care. Recent findings: Both underfeeding and overfeeding generate complications and should be prevented. The long forgotten endogenous energy production, maximal during the first 3 to 4 days, should be integrated in the nutrition plan, through a slow progression of feeding, as full feeding may result in early overfeeding. Accurate and repeated indirect calorimetry is becoming possible thanks to the recent development of a reliable, easy to use and affordable indirect calorimeter. The optimal timing of the prescription of the measured energy expenditure values as goal remains to be determined. Optimal protein prescription remains difficult as no clinically available tool has yet been identified reflecting the body needs. Summary: Although energy expenditure can now be measured, we miss indicators of early endogenous energy production and of protein needs. A pragmatic ramping up of extrinsic energy provision by nutrition support reduces the risk of overfeeding-related adverse effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000625

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endogenous glucose production may cover up to 75% of energy needs during the first 3 to 4 days of critical illness.

    “For example, endogenous glucose production may cover up to 75% of energy needs during the first 3 to 4 days of critical illness [14].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, M. M., & Pichard, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Berger, Mette M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Published
2019-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
307-313
ISSN
  • 1070-5295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-7072
OpenAlex
W2947733978
Cited by
37
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
personalized nutrition, critically ill patients, enteral nutrition, energy expenditure, indirect calorimetry, overfeeding, underfeeding, protein requirements, nutritional support
MeSH terms
Calorimetry, Indirect, Critical Care, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Critical Illness, Nutritional Support, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review