Cited by 43Problem and Project Based LearningInnovations in Medical EducationBiomedical and Engineering Education

The effectiveness of problem-based learning in pediatric medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Ma, Yimei, Lu, Xiaoxi·2019·Medicine

Abstract

Background: The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) in pediatric medical education in China. Methods: We searched Chinese electronic databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, the China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched English electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We searched for published studies that compared the effects of PBL and traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) on students’ theoretical knowledge, skill, and case analysis scores during pediatric medical education in China. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Results: A total of 12 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 1003 medical students. The PBL teaching model significantly increased theoretical knowledge scores (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–1.52; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.87–2.25; P < .00001), and case analysis scores (P < .00001, I 2 = 88%) compared with those using the LBL teaching model alone. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis shows that PBL in pediatric medical education in China appears to be more effective than the traditional teaching method in improving theoretical knowledge, skill, and case analysis scores. However, a more controlled design of RCT is needed to confirm the above conclusions in future work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000014052

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four systematic reviews and meta-analysis included in this scoping review, all carried out in China, found that PBL was more effective than lecture-based learning in improving knowledge and other skills (clinical, problem-solving, self-learning and collaborative).

    “the four systematic reviews and meta-analysis included in this scoping review, all carried out in China, found that PBL was more effective than lecture-based learning in improving knowledge and other skills (clinical, problem-solving, self-learning and collaborative) [40, 51, 53, 58].”
  • The four meta-analysis included in this review show results clearly favorable to PBL methodology in terms of knowledge, clinical skills, problem-solving, self-learning and satisfaction.

    “the four meta-analysis included in this review, which included a high number of participants, show results that are clearly favorable to the PBL methodology in terms of knowledge, clinical skills, problem-solving, self-learning and satisfaction [40, 51, 53, 58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [11]Kliegman RM Stanton BMD Geme JS Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 19th ed. The United States of America: Elsevier Medicine 2011; 6: 1.
  2. [16]Deng HZ Dong YS Chen YF Study on problem-based learning (PBL) as teaching reform in clinical clerkship in pediatrics [in Chinese]. China Higher Med Educ 2007; 2: 16– 7.
  3. [17]Xie Y Yang ZZ Chai BC Application of problem-based learning (PBL) in clinical teaching in pediatrics [in Chinese]. China Higher Med Educ 2008; 12: 18– 9.
  4. [18]Ye LP Li CC Luo YC Comparative study on problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) of clinical teaching in pediatrics [in Chinese]. China Higher Med Educ 2009; 4: 103– 4.
  5. [19]Wu JL Mu DZ Xiong Y The application of problem based learning in clinical practice for foreign students in neonatal department [in Chinese]. Res Med Educ 2010; 9: 97– 9.
  6. [20]Shao QL Yao L Zhao XX The study and application of PBL in the pediatric clinical practice [in Chinese]. Chin Foreign Med Res 2011; 24: 167– 8.
  7. [21]Chi MZ Exploration in optimizing the pediatric teaching by PBL teaching method [in Chinese]. Northwest Med Educ 2012; 5: 1015– 7.
  8. [22]Zhang H Wang BZ Kuang Q PBL teaching mode in the practical teaching effect in clinical pediatrics [in Chinese]. China J Pharmaceutical Econ 2015; 3: 125– 6.
  9. [23]Bai XL Zhang JH Gong LL The application of PBL in clinical practice of pediatrics [in Chinese]. China Continuing Med Educ 2016; 6: 8– 9.
  10. [24]Zhu XM Qiu JJ Li FM The application of PBL teaching method in pediatric clinical nursing effect assessment [in Chinese]. Harbin Med J 2017; 3: 265– 6.
  11. [25]Bai XL Yi NL Zhang JH Application of PBL teaching approach in clinical internship of nervous system diseases [in Chinese]. Contemporary Med 2017; 6: 179– 80.
  12. [26]Zhang CY Liu YF Gao XL Using PBL in pediatric preceptorship and evaluating its effects [in Chinese]. China Higher Med Educ 2017; 11: 120– 1.
  13. [27]Yi XL Li XL Jiang Y Application of PBL teaching mode in standardized training of pediatric dwellers [in Chinese]. J Qiqihar Univ Med 2017; 16: 1936– 7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Y., & Lu, X.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Xiaoxi
Venue
Medicine
Published
2019-01
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
e14052
ISSN
  • 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5964
OpenAlex
W2909164280
Cited by
43
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2017FZ0056)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biomedical and Engineering Education
Keywords
problem-based learning, pediatric medical education, lecture-based learning, medical students, theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, case analysis, teaching methods comparison, China
MeSH terms
China, Education, Medical, Humans, Pediatrics, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review