Cited by 48Problem and Project Based LearningRadiology practices and educationInnovations in Medical Education

Effects of problem-based learning in Chinese radiology education: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Zhang, Song, Xu, Jiancheng, Wang, Hongwei, Zhang, Dong, Zhang, Qichuan, Zou, Liguang·2018·Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the problem-based learning (PBL) teaching method has been extensively applied as an experimental educational method in Chinese radiology education. However, the results of individual studies were inconsistent and inconclusive. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of PBL on radiology education in China. METHODS: Databases of Chinese and English languages were searched from inception up to November 2017. The standard mean difference (SMD) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to determine the over effects of PBL compared with the traditional teaching method. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving 1487 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Of them, 16 studies provided sufficient data for the pooled analysis and showed that PBL teaching method had a positive effect on achieving higher theoretical scores compared with the traditional teaching method (SMD = 1.20, 95% CI [0.68, 1.71]). Thirteen studies provided sufficient data on skill scores, and a significant difference in favor of PBL was also observed (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI [1.38, 2.83]). Questionnaire surveys were applied in most of the included studies and indicated positive effects of PBL on students' learning interest, scope of knowledge, team spirit, and oral expression. CONCLUSION: The result shows that PBL appears to be more effective on radiology education than traditional teaching method in China. However, the heterogeneity of the included studies cannot be neglected. Further well-designed studies about this topic are needed to confirm the above findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000010069

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four systematic reviews and meta-analysis included in this scoping review, all carried out in China, found that PBL was more effective than lecture-based learning in improving knowledge and other skills (clinical, problem-solving, self-learning and collaborative).

    “the four systematic reviews and meta-analysis included in this scoping review, all carried out in China, found that PBL was more effective than lecture-based learning in improving knowledge and other skills (clinical, problem-solving, self-learning and collaborative) [40, 51, 53, 58].”
  • The four meta-analysis included in this review show results clearly favorable to PBL methodology in terms of knowledge, clinical skills, problem-solving, self-learning and satisfaction.

    “the four meta-analysis included in this review, which included a high number of participants, show results that are clearly favorable to the PBL methodology in terms of knowledge, clinical skills, problem-solving, self-learning and satisfaction [40, 51, 53, 58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [6]Li B Chen H Wang X Application and experience of PBL teaching model in medical image diagnostics. Chongqing Med J 2010; 39: 1759– 60.
  2. [7]Li H Li L Ren M Application of problem-based teaching method in medical imaging teaching. Beijing Med J 2014; 36: 496– 7.
  3. [8]Wang H Lin C Ye H The application of PBL teaching method in the teaching of image diagnostics. For All Health 2013; 7: 49– 50.
  4. [9]Chen T Guo D Zhong W Application of the combination with PBL teaching method and PACS in medical imaging teaching practice. J Mod Med Health 2014; 30: 2064– 5.
  5. [10]Deng Y Li X Wu Y Educational reform experiment of problem-based learning based on online course “Imaging diagnosis of bone and joint diseases”. Continuing Med Educ 2014; 28: 69– 71.
  6. [12]Li J The application value of PBL teaching mode in medical imaging teaching practice. Biotech World 2016; 12: 221.
  7. [13]Li X Zhang G Yu Y The application of problem-based learning method in the teaching of image diagnostics. Anhui Med J 2010; 31: 563– 5.
  8. [14]Liu X Luo X Zhao J Application of PBL teaching mode in the interventional radiology teaching of undergraduates in the department of medical imaging. J Mod Med Health 2014; 30: 2743– 4.
  9. [15]Lu M Wang J Liu G The application of PBL teaching mode in medical imaging teaching. Med J Natl Defending Forces Southwest China 2009; 19: 546– 7.
  10. [18]Shen Q Li R Shen J Application of PBL on medical imaging for traditional Chinese medical students’ clinical teaching. China Higher Med Educ 2013; 27: 81– 2.
  11. [19]Wu Q Yue J Wang J The application of problem based learning teaching model in the course of medical diagnostic imaging's clinical practice. Chin J Coal Industry Med 2014; 17: 678– 80.
  12. [20]Wu S Application of the combination with image importing and PBL teaching method in medical image diagnosis teaching in higher vocational colleges. Sci Consultant 2015; 16: 58– 9.
  13. [21]Xu H Hu H Xie B Application of PBL teaching mode in experiment teaching of medical imaging. J Baotou Med Coll 2015; 31: 111– 3.
  14. [22]Xu L Wang H Hu J Evaluating of medical imaging teaching practice with objective structure examination. Anhui Med Pharm J 2016; 20: 203– 4.
  15. [23]Yu Y Chen J Zhai J Application of PBL teaching method in clinical practice teaching of medical imaging specialty. Basic Med Educ 2011; 13: 468– 70.
  16. [24]Yue J Chen J Wang J Application of PBL teaching mode in experimental teaching of medical image diagnostics. China Higher Med Educ 2014; 28: 94– 5.
  17. [25]Zhang Y Zou J Zhang L Application research of problem based learning in medical imaging teaching. J Chengdu Univ TCM (Educational Science Edition) 2011; 13: 13– 5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Xu, J., Wang, H., Zhang, D., Zhang, Q., & Zou, L.
Affiliations
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region (CN)
  • Xinqiao Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zou, Liguang
Venue
Medicine
Published
2018-03
Volume
97
Issue
9
Pages
e0069
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791105933
Cited by
48
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81401466)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
problem-based learning, radiology education, medical education, traditional teaching methods, theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, student learning interest, team spirit, oral expression, Chinese medical students
MeSH terms
China, Educational Measurement, Humans, Language, Radiology, Students, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review