Cited by 61Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsMetabolism and Genetic DisordersGenomics and Rare Diseases

Update on congenital hypothyroidism

Cherella, Christine E., Wassner, Ari J.·2020·Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with congenital hypothyroidism. RECENT FINDINGS: Although most newborn screening strategies are designed to detect severe primary hypothyroidism that presents shortly after birth, some infants display a pattern of delayed TSH rise despite normal initial newborn screening. Recent studies suggest that delayed TSH rise may be more common and more severe than previously recognized. Although much less common than primary hypothyroidism, central congenital hypothyroidism is as likely to be of moderate or severe degree, which has implications for its detection and treatment. The discovery of new genetic causes of central congenital hypothyroidism, including the X-linked genes IGSF1, TBL1X, and IRS4, has begun to expand our understanding of thyroid axis regulation. Recent long-term data indicate that current treatment recommendations for congenital hypothyroidism result in grossly normal neurocognitive outcomes even in severely affected patients, and that overtreatment may not be as harmful as previously suspected. Liquid levothyroxine is now commercially available in the United States, but more studies are needed to determine optimal dosing using this formulation. SUMMARY: Prompt identification and adequate treatment of patients with congenital hypothyroidism is critical to optimize outcomes. New information continues to accumulate about how to improve detection of congenital hypothyroidism in specific subgroups of infants (particularly those with delayed TSH rise and central hypothyroidism) and about treatment of patients with this disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/med.0000000000000520

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dose may be reduced, since liquid LT4 at an equivalent dose can lead to increased TSH suppression.

    “Notably, the dose may be reduced, since liquid LT4 at an equivalent dose can lead to increased TSH suppression (192).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cherella, C. E., & Wassner, A. J.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wassner, Ari J.
Venue
Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity
Published
2020-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
63-69
ISSN
  • 1752-296X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-2978
OpenAlex
W2990979833
Cited by
61
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
congenital hypothyroidism, newborn screening, IGSF1, IRS4, levothyroxine, overtreatment, neuropsychological outcomes
MeSH terms
Congenital Hypothyroidism, Genetic Testing, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Neonatal Screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review