Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Disease and Severe Disability Among Working-Age Populations

Bhattacharya, Jay, Choudhry, Kavita, Lakdawalla, Darius·2008·Medical Care

Abstract

Background Recent work has shown that rates of severe disability, measured by the inability to perform basic activities of daily living, have been rising in working age populations. At the same time, the prevalence of important chronic diseases has been rising, while others falling, among working age populations. Chronically ill individuals are more likely than others to have activity of daily living limitations. Objective We examine the extent to which chronic disease trends can explain these disability trends. Data We use nationally representative survey data from the 1984-1996 National Interview Survey, which posed a consistent set of questions regarding limitations in activities of daily living over that period. Methods We decompose trends in disability into 2 parts-1 part due to trends in the prevalence of chronic disease and the other due to trends in disability prevalence among those with chronic disease. Results : Our primary findings are that for working age populations between 1984 and 1996: (1) disability prevalence fell dramatically among the nonchronically ill; (2) rising obesity prevalence explains about 40% of the rise in disability attributable to trends chronic illness; and (3) rising disability prevalence among the chronically ill explains about 60% of the rise in disability attributable to trends in chronic illness. Conclusions Disability prevention efforts in working age populations should focus on reductions in obesity prevalence and limiting disability a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181484335

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of researchers have reported increasing disability and reduced functioning ability in newer cohorts of people approaching old age.

    “A number of researchers have reported increasing disability and reduced functioning ability in newer cohorts of people approaching old age (Bhattacharya, Choudhry, & Lakdawalla, 2008; Fuller-Thomson, Yu, Nuru-Jeter, Guralnik, & Minkler, 2009; Lakdawalla, Bhattacharya, & Goldman, 2004; Martin, Freedman, Schoeni, & Andreski, 2010; Martin et al., 2009; Seeman, Merkin, Crimmins, & Karlamangla, 2010).”

    From Mortality and Morbidity Trends: Is There Compression of Morbidity? (2011) · cites this paper as Bhattacharya, Choudhry, & Lakdawalla, 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Manton, 1997, Chronic disability trends in elderly United States populations: 1982–1994., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94, 2593, 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2593 · DOI
  2. Crimmins, 1997, Further evidence on recent trends in the prevalence and incidence of disability among older Americans from two sources: the LSOA and the NHIS., J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 52, S59, 10.1093/geronb/52B.2.S59 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Crimmins, 2004, Trends in the health of the elderly., Annu Rev Public Health, 25, 79, 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.102802.124401 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Freedman, 2004, Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: report from a technical working group., Demography, 41, 417, 10.1353/dem.2004.0022 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Crimmins, 1989, Changes in life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy in the United States., Popul Dev Rev, 15, 235, 10.2307/1973704 · DOI
  6. Waidmann, 1995, The illusion of failure: trends in the self-reported health of the US elderly., Milbank Q, 73, 253, 10.2307/3350259 · DOI
  7. Gruenberg, 1977, The failures of success., Milbank Q, 55, 3, 10.2307/3349592 · DOI
  8. Lakdawalla, 2003, Forecasting the nursing home population., Med Care, 41, 8, 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00003 · DOI
  9. Lakdawalla, 2003, A response to the points by Manton and Williamson on ‘forecasting the nursing home population.’, Med Care, 41, 28, 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00006 · DOI
  10. Lakdawalla, 2004, Are the young becoming more disabled?, Health Aff, 23, 168, 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.168 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Stone, 1984, The Disabled State., 10.1007/978-1-349-17753-0 · DOI
  12. Manton, 1993, Estimates of change in chronic disability and institutional incidence and prevalence rates in the US elderly population from the 1982, 1984, and 1989 National Long Term Care Survey., J Gerontol, 48, S153, 10.1093/geronj/48.4.S153 · DOI
  13. Manton, 2006, Change in chronic disability from 1982 to 2004/2005 as measured by long-term changes in function and health in the US elderly population., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 18374, 10.1073/pnas.0608483103 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Freedman, 1998, Understanding trends in activity limitations among older Americans., Am J Public Health, 88, 1457, 10.2105/AJPH.88.10.1457 · DOI
  15. Freedman, 2000, Contribution of chronic conditions to aggregate changes in old age functioning., Am J Public Health, 90, 1755, 10.2105/AJPH.90.11.1755 · DOI
  16. Colvez, 1981, Disability trends in the United States population 1966–76: analysis of reported causes., Am J Public Health, 71, 464, 10.2105/AJPH.71.5.464 · DOI
  17. Krute, 1978, 1972 survey of disabled and nondisabled adults: chronic disease, injury, and work disability., Soc Secur Bull, 41, 3
  18. Newacheck, 2000, Prevalence, impact, and trends in childhood disability due to asthma., Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 154, 287, 10.1001/archpedi.154.3.287 · DOI
  19. 1997, Trends in the prevalence and incidence of self-reported diabetes mellitus—United States, 1980–1994., MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 46, 1014
  20. Wolf, 1998, Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States., Obes Res, 6, 97, 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1998.tb00322.x · DOI
  21. Reynolds, 1999, Cohort differences in disability and disease presence., Gerontologist, 38, 578, 10.1093/geront/38.5.578 · DOI
  22. 1994, Arthritis prevalence and activity limitations—United States, 1990., MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 43, 433
  23. Boult, 1996, Decreasing disability in the 21st century: the future effects of controlling six fatal and nonfatal conditions., Am J Public Health, 86, 1388, 10.2105/AJPH.86.10.1388 · DOI
  24. Garber, 1993, Nursing home discharges and exhaustion of Medicare benefits., J Am Stat Assoc, 88, 727, 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476333 · DOI
  25. Smith, 2006, Blurring the distinctions between on and off the job injuries: similarities and differences in circumstances., Inj Prev, 12, 236, 10.1136/ip.2006.011676 · DOI
  26. Harper, 2007, Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in adult health behaviors among US states, 1990–2004., Public Health Rep, 122, 177, 10.1177/003335490712200207 · DOI
  27. Pardes, 1999, Effects of medical research on health care and the economy., Science, 283, 36, 10.1126/science.283.5398.36 · DOI
  28. Manton, 2001, Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999., 44 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98, 6354, 10.1073/pnas.111152298 · DOI
  29. MaCurdy, 1990, Assessing empirical approaches for analyzing taxes and labor supply., J Hum Resour, 25, 415, 10.2307/145990 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bhattacharya, J., Choudhry, K., & Lakdawalla, D.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2008-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
92-100
ISSN
0025-7079
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review