The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
US Norms for Six Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes From the National Health Measurement Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A number of indexes measuring self-reported generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) using preference-weighted scoring are used widely in population surveys and clinical studies in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To obtain age-by-gender norms for older adults on 6 generic HRQoL indexes in a cross-sectional US population survey and compare age-related trends in HRQoL. METHODS: The EuroQol EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark 2, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, SF-36v2 (used to compute SF-6D), Quality of Well-being Scale self-administered form, and Health and Activities Limitations index were administered via telephone interview to each respondent in a national survey sample of 3844 noninstitutionalized adults age 35-89. Persons age 65-89 and telephone exchanges with high percentages of African Americans were oversampled. Age-by-gender means were computed using sampling and poststratification weights to adjust results to the US adult population. RESULTS: The 6 indexes exhibit similar patterns of age-related HRQoL by gender; however, means differ significantly across indexes. Females report slightly lower HRQoL than do males across all age groups. HRQoL seems somewhat higher for persons age 65-74 compared with people in the next younger age decade, as measured by all indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Six HRQoL measures show similar but not identical trends in population norms for older US adults. Results reported here provide reference values for 6 self-reported HRQoL indexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
Rabin, R., & Charro, F. D. (2001) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890109002087 · Cited by 5,613
Ware, J. E. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 · Cited by 4,455
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8 · Cited by 3,026
Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials
Pater, J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(97)82191-5 · Cited by 2,395
Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials
Spilker, B. (1996) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,862
Multiattribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., Depauw, S., Denton, M., & Boyle, M. (2002) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006 · Cited by 1,332
Self-citationThe Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12
Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000135827.18610.0d · Cited by 1,292
Cited by
Busija, L., Pausenberger, E., Haines, T. P., Haymes, S., Buchbinder, R., & Osborne, R. H. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20541 · Cited by 374
Lubeck, D., Agodoa, I., Bhakta, N., Danese, M., Pappu, K., Howard, R., Gleeson, M., Halperin, M., & Lanzkron, S. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15374 · Cited by 336
Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D
Shiroiwa, T., Fukuda, T., Ikeda, S., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1108-2 · Cited by 332
Johnston, K. M., Powell, L. C., Anderson, I. M., Szabo, S., & Cline, S. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.045 · Cited by 321
Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Public Health
Kaplan, R. M., & Hays, R. D. (2022) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052120-012811 · Cited by 308
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., Cherepanov, D., Herrington, S. A., Hays, R. D., Kaplan, R. M., Ganiats, T. G., Feeny, D., & Kind, P.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1162-1170
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985687068
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 44.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: US Norms for Six Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes From the National Health Measurement Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mlr.0b013e31814848f1
- The paper
- Fryback, D. G., Dunham, N. C., Palta, M., Hanmer, J., Buechner, J., Cherepanov, D., Herrington, S. A., Hays, R. D., Kaplan, R. M., Ganiats, T. G., Feeny, D., & Kind, P. (2007). US Norms for Six Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes From the National Health Measurement Study. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e31814848f1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.