Cited by 69Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMigration, Health and Trauma

Predisposing Characteristics, Enabling Resources and Need as Predictors of Utilization and Clinical Outcomes for Veterans Receiving Mental Health Services

Fasoli, DiJon R., Glickman, Mark E., Eisen, Susan V.·2010·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Though demand for mental health services (MHS) among US veterans is increasing, MHS utilization per veteran is decreasing. With health and social service needs competing for limited resources, it is important to understand the association between patient factors, MHS utilization, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We use a framework based on Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization to examine predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and clinical need as predictors of MHS utilization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of veterans receiving inpatient or outpatient MHS through Veterans Administration programs. Clinician ratings (Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF]) and self-report assessments (Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24) were completed for 421 veterans at enrollment and 3 months later. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine: (1) predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and need as predictors of MHS inpatient, residential, and outpatient utilization and (2) the association between individual characteristics, utilization, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Being older, female, having greater clinical need, lack of enabling resources (employment, stable housing, and social support), and easy access to treatment significantly predicted greater MHS utilization at 3-month follow-up. Less clinical need and no inpatient psychiatric hospitalization predicted better GAF and Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24 scores. White race and residential treatment also predicted better GAF scores. Neither enabling resources, nor number of outpatient mental health visits predicted clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This application of Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization confirmed associations between some predisposing characteristics, need, and enabling resources on MHS utilization but only predisposing characteristics, need, and utilization were associated with clinical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181cafbe3

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fasoli, D. R., Glickman, M. E., & Eisen, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fasoli, DiJon R.
  • Glickman, Mark E.
  • Eisen, Susan V.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2010-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
288-295
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969584992
Cited by
69
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
veterans, mental health service utilization, Andersen Behavioral Model, enabling resources, clinical needs, Global Assessment of Functioning, psychiatric hospitalization, residential treatment, outpatient mental health visits, social support, housing stability, employment, race, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Boston, Female, Forecasting, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Veterans, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Observation, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review