The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Putting the Patient Perspective in Patient-centered Outcomes Research
Open accessAbstract
Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) aims to improve care quality and patient outcomes by providing information that patients, clinicians, and family members need regarding treatment alternatives, and emphasizing patient input to inform the research process. PCOR capitalizes on available data sources and generates new evidence to provide timely and relevant information and can be conducted using prospective data collection, disease registries, electronic medical records, aggregated results from prior research, and administrative claims. Given PCOR's emphasis on the patient perspective, methods to incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical. PROs are defined by the US Food and Drug Administration as "Any report coming directly from patients… about a health condition and its treatment." However, PROs have not routinely been collected in a way that facilitates their use in PCOR. Electronic medical records, disease registries, and administrative data have only rarely collected, or been linked to, PROs. Recent technological developments facilitate the electronic collection of PROs and linkage of PRO data, offering new opportunities for putting the patient perspective in PCOR. This paper describes the importance of and methods for using PROs for PCOR. We (1) define PROs; (2) identify how PROs can be used in PCOR and the critical role of electronic data methods for facilitating the use of PRO data in PCOR; (3) outline the challenges and key unanswered questions that need to be addressed for the routine use of PROs in PCOR; and (4) discuss policy and research interventions to accelerate the integration of PROs with clinical data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128
The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., O’Leary, M. P., Bruskewitz, R. C., Holtgrewe, H. L., Mebust, W. K., Cockett, A. T. K., & The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association (1992) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5 · Cited by 3,436
The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., O'leary, M. P., Bruskewitz, R. C., Holtgrewe, H. L., Mebust, W. K., Cockett, A. T. K., & Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association (2017) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.071 · Cited by 1,940
Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials
Spilker, B. (1996) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,862
Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/77.4.371 · Cited by 1,500
Self-citationNational Institutes of Health State of the Science Conference Statement
(2005) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/28.9.1049 · Cited by 745
Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials.
Guyatt, G. H., Bombardier, C., & Tugwell, P. (1986) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 728
The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials
Gotay, C. C., Kawamoto, C. T., Bottomley, A., & Efficace, F. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.13.3439 · Cited by 644
The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?
Greenhalgh, J. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6 · Cited by 635
Acquadro, C., Berzon, R., Dubois, D., Leidy, N. K., Marquis, P., Revicki, D., & Rothman, M. (2003) · Value in Health · doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x · Cited by 519
Cited by
Toussaint, A., Hüsing, P., Gumz, A., Wingenfeld, K., Härter, M., Schramm, E., & Löwe, B. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.032 · Cited by 641
Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review
Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M., Puspitasari, A., Navarro, E., Howard, J., Kassab, H., Hoffman, M., Scott, K., Lyon, A., Douglas, S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329 · Cited by 605
Menstruation: science and society
Critchley, H. O. D., Babayev, E., Bulun, S. E., Clark, S., Garcia-Grau, I., Gregersen, P. K., Kilcoyne, A., Kim, J.-Y. J., Lavender, M., Marsh, E. E., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.004 · Cited by 448
Wallwiener, M., Matthies, L., Simoes, E., Keilmann, L., Hartkopf, A. D., Sokolov, A. N., Walter, C. B., Sickenberger, N., Wallwiener, S., Feisst, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8210 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- Supplement 8Suppl 3
- Pages
- S73-S79
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972376862
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 33.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Putting the Patient Perspective in Patient-centered Outcomes Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1d84
- The paper
- Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Putting the Patient Perspective in Patient-centered Outcomes Research. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1d84
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
