Cited by 52Gut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and DietGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How diet can impact gut microbiota to promote or endanger health

Open access
Chassaing, Benoit, Vijay-Kumar, Matam, Gewirtz, Andrew T.·2017·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Disturbances of the intestinal microbiota have been increasingly implicated in driving various diseases associated with a broad range of chronic inflammatory state. Such diseases have increased in incidence since the mid-20th century, and have roughly correlated with societal changes in food production during this period. RECENT FINDINGS: Considering how changes in diet may have impacted gut microbiota and exploring whether targeted modulations of diet might be a means of optimizing microbiota composition to promote health. SUMMARY: Recent literature demonstrates that modulation of diet has potential to both beneficially and detrimentally impact microbiota composition and how it interacts with its host. Herein, we discuss recent studies by ourselves and others that demonstrate the potential for changes in diet to have profound impacts on the gut microbiota in ways that can have beneficial or detrimental effects on host health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0000000000000401

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Chassaing, B., Vijay-Kumar, M., & Gewirtz, A. T.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gewirtz, Andrew T.
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2017-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
417-421
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763704824
Cited by
52
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation (276509)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK061417, R01DK099071, R01DK083890)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, diet, microbiota-host interactions, chronic inflammation, microbiota composition, host health
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Food Additives, Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review