The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mechanism of action of probiotics
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Probiotics are a heterogeneous group of nonpathologic bacteria that are functionally defined by their ability to allay inflammation when introduced into the inflamed intestine. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent data bearing on the possible mechanisms of action of these bacteria, with a particular focus on the relation of these mechanisms to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, their main arena of use. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies of probiotic activity in recent years provide evidence that probiotics counter experimental and human gastrointestinal inflammation (human inflammatory bowel disease) by their effects on epithelial cell function, including epithelial cell barrier function, epithelial cytokine secretion, and their antibacterial effects relating to colonization of the epithelial layer. In addition, there is emerging evidence that probiotics induce regulatory T cells that act as a break on the effector T cells that would otherwise cause inflammation. SUMMARY: This review of probiotics and inflammatory bowel disease marshals support for the concept that administration of probiotics ameliorates inflammation by exerting positive effects on the epithelial cell dysfunction and mucosal immune system dysfunction that forms the basis of the inflammation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Darfeuille-Michaud, A., Boudeau, J., Bulois, P., Neut, C., Glasser, A.-L., Barnich, N., Bringer, M.-A., Swidsinski, A., Beaugerie, L., & Colombel, J.-F. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.061 · Cited by 1,566
The neurobiology of stress and gastrointestinal disease
MAYER, E. A. (2000) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.47.6.861 · Cited by 666
Modulation of human dendritic cell phenotype and function by probiotic bacteria
Hart, A. L., Lammers, K., Brigidi, P., Vitali, B., Rizzello, F., Gionchetti, P., Campieri, M., Kamm, M. A., Knight, S. C., & Stagg, A. J. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2003.037325 · Cited by 555
Cited by
Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00017-08 · Cited by 1,013
Lactobacillus spp. for Gastrointestinal Health: Current and Future Perspectives
Dempsey, E., & Corr, S. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.840245 · Cited by 579
Commensal bacteria-dependent indole production enhances epithelial barrier function in the colon
Shimada, Y., Kinoshita, M., Harada, K., Mizutani, M., Masahata, K., Kayama, H., & Takeda, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080604 · Cited by 404
'Gut health': a new objective in medicine?
Bischoff, S. C. (2011) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-24 · Cited by 338
Packey, C. D., & Sartor, R. B. (2009) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/qco.0b013e32832a8a5d · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Boirivant, M., & Strober, W.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 679-692
- ISSN
- 0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029271200
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mechanism of action of probiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mog.0b013e3282f0cffc
- The paper
- Boirivant, M., & Strober, W. (2007). The mechanism of action of probiotics. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1097/mog.0b013e3282f0cffc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.