Cited by 183Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismImmune cells in cancer

Macrophage heterogeneity in atherosclerotic plaques

Open access
Johnson, Jason L, Newby, Andrew C·2009·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The varied behaviour of macrophages and foam cells during atherosclerosis and its clinical sequelae prompt the question whether all these activities can be the property of a single cell population. RECENT FINDINGS: Subsets of monocytes with distinct patterns of surface markers and behaviours during inflammation have recently been characterized and shown to have complementary roles during progression of atherosclerosis. A variety of macrophage phenotypes derived from these monocyte subsets in response to mediators of innate and acquired immunity have also been found in plaques. Based on functional properties and genomic signatures, they may have different impacts on facets of plaque development, including fibrous cap and lipid core formation. SUMMARY: Monocyte and macrophage phenotypic diversity is important in atherogenesis. More work is needed to define consistent marker sets for the different foam cell phenotypes in experimental animals and humans. Cell tracking studies are needed to establish their relationship with monocyte subtypes. In addition, genetic and pharmacological manipulation of phenotypes will be useful to define their functions and exploit the resulting therapeutic potential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mol.0b013e3283309848

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Hansson GK Mechanisms of disease – inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease New Engl J Med 2005 352 1685 1695 15843671
  2. [2]Nakashima Y Fujii H Sumiyoshi S Early human atherosclerosis: accumulation of lipid and proteoglycans in intimal thickenings followed by macrophage infiltration Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007 27 1159 1165 17303781
  3. Saederup N Chan L Lira SA Charo IF Fractalkine deficiency markedly reduces macrophage accumulation and atherosclerotic lesion formation in CCR2(−/−) mice: evidence for independent chemokine functions in atherogenesis Circulation 2008 117 1642 1648 The manuscript shows that combined deficiency of CCR2 and CX3CL1 reduces atherosclerosis additively in fat-fed ApoE mice. CCR2 deletion reduced numbers of circulating Ly6Chigh monocytes, but this was not further reduced by CX3CL1 deletion. The authors conclude that CX3CL1 aids recruitment of monocytes into lesions locally. They also suggest that CCR2 and CX3CL1 may recruit different subsets within the Ly6Chigh fraction. 18165355 PMC3589525
  4. [23]Libby P Nahrendorf M Pittet MJ Swirski FK Diversity of denizens of the atherosclerotic plaque: not all monocytes are created equal Circulation 2008 117 3168 3170 18574058
  5. [37]Wintergerst ES Jelk J Asmis R Differential expression of CD14, CD36 and the LDL receptor on human monocyte-derived macrophages. A novel cell culture system to study macrophage differentiation and heterogeneity Histochem Cell Biol 1998 110 231 241 9749957
  6. [50]Hakkinen T Karkola K Yla-Herttuala S Macrophages, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and T- cells express CD40 and CD40L in fatty streaks and more advanced human atherosclerotic lesions. Colocalization with epitopes of oxidized low-density lipoprotein, scavenger receptor, and CD16 (Fc gamma RIII) Virchows Arch 2000 437 396 405 11097365

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. L., & Newby, A. C.
Affiliations
Bristol Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Newby, Andrew C
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2009-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
370-378
ISSN
0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965293055
Cited by
183
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 27
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (FS/07/053/24069, RG/09/006/27918)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
Keywords
macrophage heterogeneity, atherosclerosis, foam cells, monocyte subsets, macrophage phenotype, atherogenesis, cell surface markers, innate and adaptive immunity, cell tracking
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Inflammation, Macrophages, Monocytes, Phenotype, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review