Cited by 67Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Pain and opioid use in chronic pancreatitis

Nusrat, Salman, Yadav, Dhiraj, Bielefeldt, Klaus·2012·Pancreas

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Opioid therapy for pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) is associated with tolerance and possibly opioid-induced hyperalgesia. We thus examined opioid use and pain rating in CP patients. METHODS: Medical records of patients with established CP treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Digestive Disorders Center between April 2008 and December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen unique patients (53% men; age, 50 ± 1 years) were identified. At least moderate pain was initially present in 37% of the patients. Half (51%) of the patients received opioids (average morphine equivalent, 78.1 ± 12.4 mg/d). Pain severity correlated with age (r = -0.22), history of alcohol abuse (r = 0.14), affective spectrum disorders (r = 0.14), presence of coexisting pain syndromes (r = 0.24), opioid use (r = 0.49), and days with concerns about physical (r = 0.55) or mental problems (r = 0.35). In contrast, computed tomography-defined pancreatic abnormalities (calcification, pseudocysts, ductal stones, or dilation) did not correlate with pain rating. Regression analysis identified age, days with physical problems, and a coexisting chronic pain syndrome as best independent predictors of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pancreatitis etiology, especially alcohol use, and psychosocial factors are important determinants of pain severity in CP. Successful management thus needs to go beyond treatment of changes in pancreatic morphology to effectively improve quality of life and utilization of medical resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpa.0b013e318224056f

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nusrat, S., Yadav, D., & Bielefeldt, K.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Venue
Pancreas
Published
2012-03
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
264-270
ISSN
0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032114457
Cited by
67
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pancreas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
chronic pancreatitis, pain intensity, opioid use, morphine milligram equivalents, opioid tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, alcohol abuse, affective spectrum disorders, predictors of pain, psychosocial factors, pancreatic calcification, pancreatic pseudocyst
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pennsylvania, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Pancreatitis, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review