Cited by 17Celiac Disease Research and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeInflammatory Bowel Disease

Comparison of Patients’ and Doctors’ Reports on Health‐related Quality of Life in Celiac Disease

Open access
Vriezinga, Sabine L., Farih, Nora, van der Meulen‐de Jong, Andrea E., Putter, Hein, Rings, Edmond H.H.M., Schaart, Maaike W., Schweizer, Joachim J., Wessels, Margreet M.S. +1 more·2017·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether implementation of a celiac disease (CD)–specific health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire would add value to CD follow‐up visits; we compared patients’ self‐reported CD‐specific HRQOL with the physician's report provided during a regular CD follow‐up visit in children and young adults. Methods: A cross‐sectional study in the control group of a study on self‐management in CD (CoelKids). Eligible patients had CD for ≥1 year and were 25 years or younger. They completed a CD‐specific HRQOL questionnaire (CDDUX) after their regular follow‐up visit. Their physicians were unaware of the present study's objectives or self‐reported HRQOL. Primary outcome: agreement between physician‐reported and self‐reported HRQOL. Secondary outcomes: patient variables predicting a discrepancy between reports, or a lower HRQOL. Results: Physician‐reported HRQOL was available in 70 of 78 enrolled patients. The self‐reported and physician‐reported HRQOL were concordant in 30 of 70 (K = 0.093), 6 of them had a poor self‐reported HRQOL. Reports were discrepant in 40 of 70; all 40 self‐reported a poor HRQOL. Discrepancies occurred more frequently in patients with a disease duration <9 years (32/40 with discrepant reports were diagnosed <9 years ago vs 17/30 with no discrepancy, P<0.001) and in females (35/40 with discrepant reports were girls versus 16 of 30 with no discrepancy, P = 0.001). Both factors were predictors of a poorer HRQOL. Conclusions: During regular CD follow‐up visits, physicians did not report a poor HRQOL in 40 of 46 children and young adults with a poor self‐reported HRQOL. This is consistent with previous studies examining other chronic diseases and supports the implementation of self‐reported CD‐specific HRQOL measurements in CD follow‐up visits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001355

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physicians overestimate the health-related quality of life of children and young adults with celiac disease during follow-up.

    “In the only study on the subject, physicians were found to overestimate the HRQOL of children and young adults with CD during follow-up (109).”
  • Five of six studies using celiac disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires found that the health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with celiac disease was poor or neutral.

    “However, five of the six studies using CD-specific HRQOL questionnaires (CDDUX, CDQL, CDQOL Scale-KINDL, CDPQOL) found that the HRQOL of children and adolescents with CD was poor or neutral (82, 96, 100, 105, 109).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vriezinga, S. L., Farih, N., van der Meulen‐de Jong, A. E., Putter, H., Rings, E. H. H. M., Schaart, M. W., Schweizer, J. J., Wessels, M. M. S., & Mearin, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden
Corresponding author
  • Vriezinga, Sabine L.
  • Farih, Nora
  • Rings, Edmond H.H.M.
  • Schaart, Maaike W.
  • Schweizer, Joachim J.
  • Wessels, Margreet M.S.
  • Mearin, M. Luisa
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
737-741
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2492468438
Cited by
17
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (171201006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
celiac disease, health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, physician-reported outcomes, children and young adults, disease duration, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Quality of Life, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review