Cited by 25Celiac Disease Research and ManagementVaccine Coverage and HesitancyHepatitis B Virus Studies

Response to Hepatitis A and B Vaccination in Pediatric Patients With Celiac Disease

Urganci, Nafiye, Kalyoncu, Derya·2013·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the response to hepatitis A and B vaccinations in pediatric patients with celiac disease (CD). Methods: Thirty patients with CD ages 1 to 15 years were compared with 50 healthy age‐, sex‐, and body mass index–matched controls. Screening for hepatitis A and B serology was carried out before vaccination. Susceptible cases received 20 μg of recombinant DNA vaccine for hepatitis B (0,1, and 6 months) and 720 milliELISA units of inactivated hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine (0 and 6 months). Postvaccination serologic evaluation was performed 1 month after the last dose of primary vaccination, 1 month after the booster dose, and once every year during follow‐up. Results: Sixteen patients and 35 controls received hepatitis A vaccine; protective anti‐HAV antibodies were developed in 12 (75%) of the patients and all of the controls (75% vs 100%, respectively; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.92, P = 0.007). Thirty patients and 50 controls received hepatitis B vaccine, and 70% of the patients vs 90% of the controls achieved seroprotection (anti‐HBs titers ≥10 mIU/mL) 1 month after primary vaccination (95% CI 0.74–0.90, P = 0.03). Four patients were unresponsive to both of the vaccines. The overall seroprotection rates were 96% in controls and 80% in patients after the whole hepatitis B vaccination series (95% CI 0.04–0.18, P = 0.04). No significant reduction was observed in antibody response among patients and controls during follow‐up period. Conclusions: The rate of seroconversion to the hepatitis B virus‐ and HAV vaccine is lower in patients with CD than in healthy controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e31827af200

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urganci, N., & Kalyoncu, D.
Affiliations
  • Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital Istanbul Turkey
  • Şişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
408-411
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2314689659
Cited by
25
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Keywords
celiac disease, hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, vaccine response, seroprotection, anti-HAV antibodies, anti-HBs antibodies, pediatric patients, vaccine immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hepatitis B Antibodies, Hepatitis B virus, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Vaccines, Inactivated, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Hepatitis A Virus, Human, Vaccines, DNA, Hepatitis A Vaccines, Hepatitis A Antibodies, Immunity, Humoral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review