Cited by 50Cancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCancer survivorship and careIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Exercise as an Intervention to Mitigate Decreased Cognitive Function From Cancer and Cancer Treatment: An Integrative Review

Open access
Myers, Jamie S., Erickson, Kirk I., Sereika, Susan M., Bender, Catherine M.·2018·Cancer Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreased cognitive function associated with non-central nervous system cancers and cancer treatment significantly affects cancer survivors' quality of life. Exercise may be an effective intervention to mitigate decreased cognitive function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to conduct an integrative review to summarize and critique the available evidence related to the use of exercise as a potential intervention for decreased cognitive function from cancer and cancer treatment. METHODS: We conducted an integrative review through January 2016 utilizing PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Broad inclusion criteria included any quantitative study in which cognitive outcomes were reported in relationship to any type of exercise for adult cancer survivors. Effect sizes were calculated when possible based on available data. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included for review. The majority of studies (including aerobic or resistance exercise as well as mindfulness-based exercise) were associated with some improved cognitive outcomes. However, studies varied significantly in levels of evidence, cognitive domains assessed, and types of cognitive measures. Less than half of the studies included objective measures of cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows promising trends for the use of exercise as a potential intervention for improving cognitive function following cancer and cancer treatment, but questions remain concerning exercise type, timing of initiation, intensity, frequency, and duration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Additional research is warranted to understand how various types of exercise influence cognitive function in the cancer survivor population and to better understand the mechanisms driving these effects. Trial designs that include both objective and subjective measures of cognitive function are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000549

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Myers and colleagues reported that 7 of 11 randomized controlled trials indicated improved cognitive function due to physical activity, but only two studies used objective measures of cognition.

    “Myers et al., (63) reported that 7 of 11 RCTs indicated improved cognitive function due to PA (aerobic, resistance, mindfulness-based exercise, or a combination of PA modes). However, only two of the studies used objective measures of cognition (63).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Cooper H Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews 2 Newbury Park Sage Publications 1989
  2. [58]Wagner L Sweet J Butt Z Lai J Cella D Measuring patient self-reported cognitive function: Development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function instrument Journal of Supportive Oncology 2009 7 W32 W39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, J. S., Erickson, K. I., Sereika, S. M., & Bender, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Myers, Jamie S.
Venue
Cancer Nursing
Published
2018-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
327-343
ISSN
  • 0162-220X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9804
OpenAlex
W2768866966
Cited by
50
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR011972)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
exercise intervention, cognitive function, cancer survivors, cancer treatment side effects, aerobic exercise, resistance training, quality of life, cognitive domain, exercise intensity and frequency
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Neoplasms, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review