Cited by 23Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Examining the Relationship Between Patient Fatigue-Related Symptom Clusters and Carer Depressive Symptoms in Advanced Cancer Dyads: A Secondary Analysis of a Large Hospice Data Set

Buck, Harleah G., Benitez, Bryan, Fradley, Michael G., Donovan, Kristine A., McMillan, Susan C., Reich, Richard R., Wang, Hsiao-Lan·2020·Cancer Nursing

Abstract

Background Most symptom management takes place in the community, conducted by patient and/or informal carer dyads with guidance from clinicians. Given the prevalence of cancer, there is a critical need for examination of the impact of managing multiple symptoms, particularly those that cluster with fatigue, on informal carers. Objectives To (1) examine clustering of patient fatigue-related symptom severity and distress in individuals with cancer and (2) test the hypothesis that patient fatigue-related symptom clusters (severity, distress) will be positively associated with carer depressive symptoms. Methods Secondary analysis of 689 hospice patient/informal carer dyads using exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Patient symptoms were measured by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, and carer depressive symptoms were measured by the Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression Scale. Results Patients were 73 (SD, 12) years old, and 43% were female. Carers were 65 years (SD, 14) years old, and 74% were female. For symptom severity, dyspnea, dry mouth, lack of appetite, drowsiness, cough, dizziness, and difficulty swallowing clustered with fatigue. For symptom distress, dyspnea, cough, and dry mouth clustered with fatigue. Structural equation modeling results indicated that the patient fatigue severity cluster was positively related to carer depressive symptoms (b = 0.12, P Conclusion Managing multiple symptoms that cluster with fatigue negatively impact…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000737

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buck, H. G., Benitez, B., Fradley, M. G., Donovan, K. A., McMillan, S. C., Reich, R. R., & Wang, H.-L.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Buck, Harleah G.
Venue
Cancer Nursing
Published
2019-07-30
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
498-505
ISSN
  • 0162-220X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9804
OpenAlex
W2964610462
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, symptom clusters, informal caregivers, caregiver depressive symptoms, advanced cancer, hospice care, symptom severity, symptom distress, dyspnea, xerostomia, caregiver burden, patient-caregiver dyads
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Caregivers, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review