Cited by 41Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mindreading Dysfunction in Avoidant Personality Disorder Compared With Other Personality Disorders

Moroni, Fabio, Procacci, Michele, Pellecchia, Giovanni, Semerari, Antonio, Nicolò, Giuseppe, Carcione, Antonino, Pedone, Roberto, Colle, Livia·2016·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

The ability to reflect on one's own states of mind and those of others (metacognition or mindreading) is strongly implicated in personality disorders (PDs). Metacognition involves different abilities, and there is evidence that specific abilities can be selectively impaired in different PDs. The purposes of this study were to compare metacognitive competence in avoidant PD (AvPD) with that in other PDs and to investigate whether there is a specific profile for AvPD. Sixty-three patients with AvPD and 224 patients with other PDs were assessed using the Metacognitive Assessment Interview. AvPD patients showed difficulties with two metacognitive functions: monitoring and decentration, even when the severity of psychopathology was controlled for. These results support the hypothesis of specific profiles of metacognitive dysfunction in different PDs and highlight a close link between impaired monitoring and decentration functions and the inhibited and withdrawn personality style typical of AvPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000536

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCID-I and SCID-II had adequate inter-rater reliability for trait scores (ICC 0.84-0.99; mean 0.93) and categorical diagnoses (average κ = 0.90) in previous studies.

    “In previous studies we observed that inter-rater reliability was adequate for both trait scores (a two-way mixed absolute agreement model for intra-class correlations coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 0.99; mean, 0.93) and categorical diagnoses (average κ = 0.90) [52].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moroni, F., Procacci, M., Pellecchia, G., Semerari, A., Nicolò, G., Carcione, A., Pedone, R., & Colle, L.
Affiliations
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Moroni, Fabio
  • Procacci, Michele
  • Pellecchia, Giovanni
  • Semerari, Antonio
  • Nicolò, Giuseppe
  • Carcione, Antonino
  • Pedone, Roberto
  • Colle, Livia
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2016-10
Volume
204
Issue
10
Pages
752-757
ISSN
  • 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-736X
OpenAlex
W2403041468
Cited by
41
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
avoidant personality disorder, metacognition, theory of mind, metacognitive monitoring, decentering, personality disorders
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review