Cited by 104Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPersonality Traits and Psychology

The Role of Mindfulness in Borderline Personality Disorder Features

Wupperman, Peggilee, Neumann, Craig S., Whitman, Jeannie B., Axelrod, Seth R.·2009·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study investigated whether deficits in mindfulness (attention, awareness, and acceptance of the present moment) underlie variability in borderline personality disorder (BPD) features and related impairments in interpersonal functioning, impulsivity, and emotion regulation. A path analytic approach was used to examine the relationships of trait mindfulness with BPD features, interpersonal effectiveness, impulsive and passive emotion-regulation, and neuroticism in a psychiatric sample of adults (N = 70). As hypothesized, mindfulness was associated inversely with BPD features and core areas of dysfunction, and these associations continued when controlling for neuroticism. Furthermore, mindfulness deficits continued to predict BPD features even when interpersonal effectiveness, passive and impulsive emotion-regulation, and neuroticism were controlled. These findings suggest that mindfulness may be a unique predictor for the expression of BPD pathology. An emphasis on mindfulness may thus be crucial in enhancing the formulation and treatment of BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181b97343

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wupperman, P., Neumann, C. S., Whitman, J. B., & Axelrod, S. R.
Affiliations
  • City University of New York (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wupperman, Peggilee
  • Axelrod, Seth R.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2009-10
Volume
197
Issue
10
Pages
766-771
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079586269
Cited by
104
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness, borderline personality disorder, interpersonal effectiveness, impulsivity, emotion regulation, neuroticism, trait mindfulness, present-moment awareness, acceptance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Attention, Awareness, Borderline Personality Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Emotions, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review