Cited by 62Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

The Adaptive Coping with Emotions Model (ACE Model)

Berking, Matthias, Whitley, Brian·2014·Affect Regulation Training

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-1022-9_3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berking, M., & Whitley, B.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Venue
Affect Regulation Training
Published
2014
Pages
19-29
OpenAlex
W127995002
Cited by
62
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
emotion regulation, emotion regulation skills, emotional awareness, emotion labeling, self-support, emotion regulation interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review