Cited by 55Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy

Bressi, Cinzia, Porcellana, Matteo, Marinaccio, Paola Marianna, Nocito, Emanuela Paola, Magri, Lorenzo·2010·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in the treatment of patients suffering from anxiety or depressive disorders, as compared with a control case sample composed of patients undergoing treatment as usual (TAU). Sixty patients with depressive or anxiety disorders according to DSM IV-TR were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group (STPP) or control group for 12 months (T1). Primary outcome measures were the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), and the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale. Intention to treat analysis revealed that patients who received STPP showed significantly more improvements in comparison with those who were in the TAU group on Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale and IIP measures. This study offers evidence that STPP is an effective treatment for patients with anxiety or depressive disorders, and it could be more effective than TAU in improving interpersonal problems as measured by IIP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181ef3ebb

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bressi, C., Porcellana, M., Marinaccio, P. M., Nocito, E. P., & Magri, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Bressi, Cinzia
  • Marinaccio, Paola Marianna
  • Nocito, Emanuela Paola
  • Magri, Lorenzo
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2010-09
Volume
198
Issue
9
Pages
647-652
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991511591
Cited by
55
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
short-term dynamic psychotherapy, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, usual care, interpersonal problems, treatment efficacy, symptom improvement
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Brief, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review