Cited by 17Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsClinical practice guidelines implementation

Antenatal Care: A Comparative Review of Guidelines

Boureka, Eirini, Tsakiridis, Ioannis, Kostakis, Nikolaos, Giouleka, Sonia, Mamopoulos, Apostolos, Kalogiannidis, Ioannis, Athanasiadis, Apostolos, Dagklis, Themistoklis·2024·Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey

Abstract

Importance: Antenatal care plays a crucial role in safely monitoring and ensuring the well-being of both the mother and the fetus during pregnancy, ultimately leading to the best possible perinatal outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published guidelines on antenatal care. Evidence Acquisition: A descriptive review of guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Public Health Agency of Canada, the World Health Organization, and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists regarding antenatal care was conducted. Results: There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the necessary appointments during the antenatal period, the proper timing for induction of labor, the number and frequency of laboratory examinations for the assessment of mother's well-being, and management strategies for common physiological problems during pregnancy, such as nausea and vomiting, heartburn, pelvic pain, leg cramps, and symptomatic vaginal discharge. In addition, special consideration should be given for mental health issues and timely referral to a specialist, reassurance of complete maternal vaccination, counseling for safe use of medical agents, and advice for cessation of substance, alcohol, and tobacco use during pregnancy. Controversy surrounds clinical evaluation during the antenatal period, particularly when it comes to the routine use of an oral glucose tolerance test and symphysis-fundal height measurement for assessing fetal growth, whereas routine cardiotocography and fetal movement counting are suggested practices only by Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Of note, recommendations on nutritional interventions and supplementation are offered only by Public Health Agency of Canada and World Health Organization, with some minor discrepancies in the optimal dosage. Conclusions: Antenatal care remains a critical factor in achieving positive outcomes, but there are variations depending on the socioeconomic status of each country. Therefore, the establishment of consistent international protocols for optimal antenatal care is of utmost importance. This can help provide safe guidance for healthcare providers and, consequently, improve both maternal and fetal outcomes. Target Audience: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objectives: After participating in this activity, the learner should be better able to describe appropriate laboratory and clinical assessment plans during the antenatal period; identify common physiological problems of pregnancy and propose appropriate management strategies; and evaluate the recommended supplementation and nutritional interventions during pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001261

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First-trimester sonographic examination is a fundamental part of antenatal care.

    “First-trimester sonographic examination remains a fundamental part of antenatal care, providing crucial information for the well-being of both the mother and fetus and leading to the best possible perinatal outcomes.”
  • The AWMF, ISUOG, SOGC and WAPM consider the first-trimester ultrasound a fundamental part of routine antenatal care and recommend it for all pregnant women.

    “The AWMF, ISUOG, SOGC and WAPM agree regarding the indications for performing this examination. In detail, these medical societies consider the first-trimester ultrasound as a fundamental part of routine antenatal care, recommending it for all pregnant women [1].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Kostakis, N., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., Athanasiadis, A., & Dagklis, T.
Affiliations
  • Resident
  • Assistant Professor
  • Professor
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
  • Boureka, Eirini
  • Kostakis, Nikolaos
  • Giouleka, Sonia
Venue
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Published
2024-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
290-303
ISSN
  • 0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-9866
OpenAlex
W4398156239
Cited by
17
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
prenatal care, guideline comparison, labor induction, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, heartburn, leg cramps, vaginal discharge, maternal mental health, maternal immunization, drug use in pregnancy, substance use in pregnancy, oral glucose tolerance test, symphysis-fundal height, fetal growth assessment, cardiotocography, fetal movement counting, prenatal nutrition, prenatal supplementation, perinatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Australia, Canada, Female, Humans, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review