The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Macular Pigment and Visual Performance Under Glare Conditions
Abstract
PURPOSE: Many parameters of visual performance (e.g., contrast sensitivity) are compromised under glaring light conditions. Recent data indicate that macular pigment (MP) is strongly related to improvements in glare disability and photostress recovery based on a filtering mechanism. In this study, we assessed the causality of this relation by supplementing lutein and zeaxanthin for 6 months while measuring MP, glare disability, and photostress recovery. METHODS: Forty healthy subjects (mean age = 23.9) participated in the study. Subjects were followed for 6 months and assessed at baseline, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months. Spatial density profiles of MP were measured using heterochromatic flicker photometry. Disability glare was measured using a 1 degree-diameter circular grating surrounded by a broadband glare source (a xenon-white annulus). The intensity of the annulus (11 degree inner and 12 degree outer diameters) was adjusted by the subject until the grating target was no longer seen. For the photostress recovery experiment, the time required to detect a 1 degree-diameter grating stimulus after a 5-s exposure to a 2.5 muW/cm2, 5 degree-diameter disk was recorded. Subjects were tested under central viewing and eccentric viewing (10 degree temporal retina) conditions. RESULTS: At the baseline time point, MP optical density (OD) at 30' eccentricity ranged from 0.08 to 1.04, and was strongly correlated with improved visual performance in the two glare tasks. After 6 months of lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z) supplementation, average MPOD (at 30' eccentricity) had increased from 0.41 to 0.57, and was shown to significantly reduce the deleterious effects of glare for both the visual performance tasks assessed. CONCLUSIONS: MP is strongly related to improvements in glare disability and photostress recovery in a manner strongly consistent with its spectral absorption and spatial profile. Four to 6 months of 12 mg daily L + Z supplementation significantly increases MPOD and improves visual performance in glare for most subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of lutein and zeaxanthin in visual and cognitive function throughout the lifespan
Johnson, E. J. (2014) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/nure.12133 · Cited by 438
Lutein: More than just a filter for blue light
Kijlstra, A., Tian, Y., Kelly, E. R., & Berendschot, T. T. J. M. (2012) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.03.002 · Cited by 349
Moran, N. E., Mohn, E. S., Hason, N., Erdman, J. W., & Johnson, E. J. (2018) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy025 · Cited by 205
Lutein and Zeaxanthin Influence Brain Function in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lindbergh, C. A., Renzi-Hammond, L. M., Hammond, B. R., Terry, D. P., Mewborn, C. M., Puente, A. N., & Miller, L. S. (2018) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617717000534 · Cited by 94
Self-citationTechnological readiness of commercial microalgae species for foods
Yang, S., Fan, Y., Cao, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2194423 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- STRINGHAM, J. M., & HAMMOND, B. R.
- Venue
- Optometry and Vision Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 82-88
- ISSN
- 1040-5488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152574997
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macular Pigment and Visual Performance Under Glare Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/opx.0b013e318162266e
- The paper
- STRINGHAM, J. M., & HAMMOND, B. R. (2008). Macular Pigment and Visual Performance Under Glare Conditions. Optometry and Vision Science. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e318162266e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.