Cited by 31

Technological readiness of commercial microalgae species for foods

Yang, Shufang, Fan, Yuwei, Cao, Yue, Wang, Yuxin, Mou, Haijin, Sun, Han·2024·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Microalgae have great potential as a future source to meet the increasing global demand for foods. Several microalgae are permitted as safety sources in different countries and regions, and processed as commercial products. However, edible safety, economic feasibility, and acceptable taste are the main challenges for microalgal application in the food industry. Overcome such challenges by developing technology accelerates transition of microalgae into sustainable and nutritious diets. In this review, edible safety of Spirulina , Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , Chlorella , Haematococcus pluvialis , Dunaliella salina , Schizochytrium and Nannochloropsis is introduced, and health benefits of microalgae-derived carotenoids, amino acids, and fatty acids are discussed. Technologies of adaptive laboratory evolution, kinetic model, bioreactor design and genetic engineering are proposed to improve the organoleptic traits and economic feasibility of microalgae. Then, current technologies of decoloration and de-fishy are summarized to provide options for processing. Novel technologies of extrusion cooking, delivery systems, and 3D bioprinting are suggested to improve food quality. The production costs, biomass values, and markets of microalgal products are analyzed to reveal the economic feasibility of microalgal production. Finally, challenges and future perspectives are proposed. Social acceptance is the major limitation of microalgae-derived foods, and further efforts are required toward…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2023.2194423

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S., Fan, Y., Cao, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Microbiome Engineering, Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
  • College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
  • Nanomaterials and Technology, Beijing Jiao Tong University, Beijing, China
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2023-03-31
Volume
64
Issue
22
Pages
7993-8017
ISSN
  • 1040-8398
  • 1549-7852
Cited by
31
References
23
Language
en
Funders
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology R & D Fund (20220809171532001)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0900705)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M703039)
  • Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen (KQTD20180412181334790)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review