The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire: Evaluation in Visually Impaired
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the psychometric properties of the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ) in children with visual impairment (VI) using Rasch analysis. METHODS: One hundred fifty Indian children with VI between 8 and 16 years (mean age, 11.6 years; 69% male; mean acuity in the better eye of 0.80 logMAR [Snellen, 20/126]) were administered the revised OBVQ. The 40-item revised OBVQ was developed to assess victimization (i.e., being bullied) and bullying (bullying others) in normally sighted schoolchildren. Only 16 items are used for Rasch analysis and are divided into two parts: I (victimization, eight items) and II (bullying others, eight items). Separate Rasch analysis was conducted for both parts, and the psychometric properties investigated included behavior of rating scale, extent to which the items measured a single construct (unidimensionality by fit statistics and principal component analysis [PCA] of residuals); ability to discriminate among participants' victimization and bullying behaviors (measurement precision as assessed by person separation reliability [PSR] minimum recommended value, 0.80); and targeting of items to participants' victimization and bullying. RESULTS: Response categories were misused for both parts I and II, which required repair before further analysis. Measurement precision was inadequate for both parts (PSR, 0.64 for part I and 0.19 for part II), indicating poor discriminatory ability. All items fit the Rasch model well in part I, indicating unidimensionality that was further confirmed using PCA of residuals. However, an item misfit in part II that required deletion following which the remaining items fit and PCA of residuals also supported unidimensionality. Targeting was -0.58 logits for part I, indicating that the items were matched well with the participants' victimization. By comparison, targeting was suboptimal for part II (-1.97 logits). CONCLUSIONS: In its current state, the revised OBVQ is not a valid psychometric instrument to assess victimization and bullying among children with VI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x · Cited by 3,639
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 · Cited by 2,694
Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention
Olweus, D. (1997) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03172807 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire
Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.10047 · Cited by 1,772
Cyberbullying Via Social Media
Whittaker, E., & Kowalski, R. M. (2015) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2014.949377 · Cited by 498
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025411407457 · Cited by 444
Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research
Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2004) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(03)00033-8 · Cited by 403
The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review
Evans, C. B. R., Fraser, M. W., & Cotter, K. L. (2014) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Gothwal, V. K., Sumalini, R., Irfan, S. M., Giridhar, A., & Bharani, S.
- Venue
- Optometry and Vision Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 828-835
- ISSN
- 1040-5488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036678909
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 37.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire: Evaluation in Visually Impaired. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/opx.0b013e3182959b52
- The paper
- Gothwal, V. K., Sumalini, R., Irfan, S. M., Giridhar, A., & Bharani, S. (2013). Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire: Evaluation in Visually Impaired. Optometry and Vision Science. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e3182959b52
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.