Cited by 62Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pharmacological, physical, and psychological treatments of pain: findings from the Chronic Pain & COVID-19 Pan-Canadian Study

Open access
Lacasse, Anaïs, Pagé, M. Gabrielle, Dassieu, Lise, Sourial, Nadia, Janelle-Montcalm, Audrée, Dorais, Marc, Nguena Nguefack, Hermine Lore, Godbout-Parent, Marimée +5 more·2021·PAIN Reports

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal treatment is recognized as the optimal paradigm for the management of chronic pain (CP). Careful balance between pharmacological and physical/psychological approaches is thus desirable but can be easily disrupted. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacological and physical/psychological treatments of CP. METHODS: A Pan-Canadian cross-sectional web-based study was conducted between April 16th and May 31st 2020 among adults living with CP when the country was in the ascending slope of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. RESULTS: A total of 2864 participants shared their treatment experience (mean age: 49.7 years and women: 83.5%). Among medication users (n = 2533), 38.3% reported changes in their pharmacological pain treatment. The main reasons were as follows: (1) changes in pain symptoms, (2) lack of access to prescribers/cancellation of medical appointments, and (3) increased medication intake in compensation for stopping physical/psychological treatments because of the pandemic. Among participants who used physical/psychological pain management approaches before the pandemic (n = 2467), 68.3% had to modify their treatments or self-management strategies. Common reasons were lack of access to clinics/exercise facilities and the need to compensate for having to stop another type of physical/psychological treatment because of the pandemic-related public health safety measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underlines the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to pain relief, which is considered a fundamental human right. Results will help to justify resource allocation and inform the development of interventions to be better prepared for waves to come and future health crises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000891

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]CEFRIO. L'usage des médias sociaux au Québec. Enquête NETendances 2018; 9:1-18.
  2. [34]Jensen MP Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk DC Melzack R, editors. Handbook of pain assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2001. p. 15– 34.
  3. [44]McDonagh MS Selph SS Buckley DI Holmes RS Mauer K Ramirez S Hsu FC Dana T Fu R Chou R. Nonopioid Pharmacologic Treatments for Chronic Pain [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Apr. (Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 228.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556277/. 32338847

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacasse, A., Pagé, M. G., Dassieu, L., Sourial, N., Janelle-Montcalm, A., Dorais, M., Nguena Nguefack, H. L., Godbout-Parent, M., Hudspith, M., Moor, G., Sutton, K., Thompson, J. M., & Choinière, M.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • StatSciences Inc., Notre-Dame-de-l'Île-Perrot, QC, Canada
  • Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Rouyn-Noranda, QC, Canada
  • Pain BC (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lacasse, Anaïs
Venue
PAIN Reports
Published
2021-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e891
ISSN
2471-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130367776
Cited by
62
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PAIN Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, chronic pain, pain management, pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy, psychological intervention, health care access, treatment interruption, self-management, medication use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review