Cited by 20Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth disparities and outcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Impact of demographic factors on chronic pain among adults in the United States

Open access
Mullins, Peter M., Yong, Robert J., Bhattacharyya, Neil·2022·PAIN Reports

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pain affects more than 1 in 5 American adults, and its effects are not evenly distributed throughout the population. Methods: Using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a household-based annual survey of self-reported health status of U.S. adults, this cross-sectional study describes differences in the prevalence of chronic pain and its effects across socioeconomic groups. Results: In univariate analyses, chronic pain was more prevalent among female respondents, persons with lower educational attainment, non-Hispanic White individuals, and those who were insured as well as those who were married. After accounting for all other demographic factors, age, female sex, and lower educational attainment were associated with higher odds of having chronic pain, whereas Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black race were associated with lower odds. Despite lower odds of having chronic pain, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black race were associated with greater odds of reporting more severe pain than White race. There were no significant differences across race in the effects of pain on life, work, or family, although female sex and lower educational attainment were associated with greater effects of pain on these domains. Educational attainment was the only characteristic associated with greater odds of ineffective pain management after accounting for all other demographic factors. Conclusions: Implications for reducing disparities in the treatment of chronic pain are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001009

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-Hispanic Black adults and Hispanic adults are more likely to experience chronic pain than non-Hispanic white adults.

    “It is established that non-Hispanic Black adults and Hispanic adults are more likely to experience chronic pain than non-Hispanic white adults, 31”

    From Overview and Feasibility of a Novel Transdisciplinary Integrative Approach to High Impact Chronic Pain in Vermont (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results and Discussion report the opposite for chronic pain overall: non-Hispanic White adults had the highest reported rate, and Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black adults had lower adjusted odds. The Introduction refers to earlier data about *severe* chronic pain, which does not support the unqualified claim about chronic pain. (LLM, conf=0.95)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The NHIS data showed that increased age, decreasing level of education, and non-married status were associated with higher likelihood of the presence of chronic pain.

    “The NHIS data showed that increased age, decreasing level of education, and non-married status were associated with higher likelihood of the presence of chronic pain. 31”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Gaskin DJ Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. In: Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on advancing pain research, care, and education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2011. Appendix C. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92521/. Accessed May 9, 2021. 22553896

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullins, P. M., Yong, R. J., & Bhattacharyya, N.
Affiliations
  • Emergency Medicine and
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
Corresponding author
Mullins, Peter M.
Venue
PAIN Reports
Published
2022-06-06
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e1009
ISSN
2471-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286284539
Cited by
20
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PAIN Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, demographic factors, socioeconomic disparities, educational attainment, sex differences, racial disparities, Hispanic adults, Black people, pain intensity, health insurance, marital status, United States adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review