Cited by 49Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach

Open access
Mauck, Matthew C., Aylward, Aileen F., Barton, Chloe E., Birckhead, Brandon, Carey, Timothy, Dalton, Diane M., Fields, Aaron J., Fritz, Julie +10 more·2022·PAIN Reports

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP. Objective: The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. Methods: A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered. Conclusion: The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001019

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Chou R Deyo R Friedly J Skelly A Hashimoto R Weimer M Fu R Dana T Kraegel P Griffin J Grusing S Brodt E. Noninvasive treatments for low back pain. Comparative effectiveness review No. 169. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2016 p. 26985522
  2. [46]McDonagh M Shelley S Buckley D Holmes R Mauer K Ramirez S Hsu F Dana T Fu R Chou R. Nonopioid pharmacologic treatments for chronic pain. Comparative Effectiveness Review 2020: No. 228. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 32338847
  3. [57]Skelly AC Chou R Dettori JR Turner JA Friedly JL Rundell SD Fu R Brodt ED Wasson N Kantner S Ferguson AJR. Noninvasive nonpharmacological treatment for chronic pain: A systematic review update. Comparative Effectiveness Review 2020: No. 227. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 32338846

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mauck, M. C., Aylward, A. F., Barton, C. E., Birckhead, B., Carey, T., Dalton, D. M., Fields, A. J., Fritz, J., Hassett, A. L., Hoffmeyer, A., Jones, S. B., McLean, S. A., Mehling, W. E., O'Neill, C. W., Schneider, M. J., Williams, D. A., Zheng, P., & Wasan, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Anesthesiology
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mauck, Matthew C.
Venue
PAIN Reports
Published
2022-09
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e1019
ISSN
2471-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298127187
Cited by
49
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PAIN Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U19AR076734)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (UH3AT009763)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic low back pain, personalized medicine, treatment selection, evidence-based interventions, duloxetine, acceptance and commitment therapy, exercise therapy, manual therapy, self-management, HEAL Initiative, biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review