Cited by 46Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Can functional septorhinoplasty independently treat obstructive sleep apnea?

Shuaib, Stefan W., Undavia, Satyen, Lin, Juan, Johnson, Calvin M., Stupak, Howard D.·2015·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether functional rhinoplasty alone results in a significant improvement in obstructive sleep apnea parameters in patients with nasal obstruction. METHODS: Records of consecutive adult patients with nasal obstruction who underwent surgery to repair their nasal inlet and completed preoperative and postoperative polysomnography were reviewed. Patients underwent polysomnography before and after functional septorhinoplasty. Long-term follow-up using Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. A Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction was also used because of multiple statistical comparisons being made. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in this study. Mean apnea-hypopnea index scores preoperatively was 24.7, which dropped to a mean postoperative apnea-hypopnea index of 16, a reduction of 35 percent (p = 0.013). Excluding patients with a body mass index greater than 30 resulted in improved apnea-hypopnea index scores, from 22.5 to 9.6, a mean 57 percent reduction (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Functional rhinoplasty may have the potential to significantly improve the severity of obstructive sleep apnea for select patients with nasal obstruction. The nasal airflow improvement may modify pharyngeal aerodynamics. This is a fast and minimally invasive approach to consider in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and nasal obstruction, especially in patients with a body mass index less than 30. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000001285

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shuaib, S. W., Undavia, S., Lin, J., Johnson, C. M., & Stupak, H. D.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Jacobi Medical Center (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2015-06
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
1554-1565
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409090051
Cited by
46
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, nasal obstruction, apnea-hypopnea index, nasal airflow, body mass index, polysomnography
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Septum, Postoperative Care, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Nasal Obstruction, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Risk Assessment, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review